<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xml" href="http://dzone.com/links/misc/rss.xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dz="http://www.developerzone.com/modules/dz/1.0" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>dzone.com: xml</title>
    <link>http://dzone.com/links/tag/xml.html</link>
    <description>dzone.com: fresh links for developers</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright (c) 2008 DZone, Inc.</copyright>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:51:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>The dzone.com community</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-25T07:51:04Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright (c) 2008 DZone, Inc.</dc:rights>
    <dz:selfLink>http://dzone.com/links/feed/frontpage/xml/rss.xml</dz:selfLink>
    
    <item>
      <title>Google's "Chrome OS" is Bad Evolution</title>
      <link>http://dzone.com/links/rss/googles_chrome_os_is_bad_evolution.html</link>
      <description>Computing evolved with Desktop computing and then web apps. Browser Based apps are always slow and faulty, they can never as robust as a desktop can be.&#xD;
&#xD;
After The invention of web services and REST API, I would love to see web enabled desktop Apps. &#xD;
&#xD;
I love the concept of Portable Apps , When we mix concept of portable Apps and Cloud Based storage, we can achieve much better results.  BUT Google will never let it happen, they are re-inventing all those age old things again in browser. I have posted a small video response on you tube.</description>
      <category>javascript</category>
      <category>microsoft</category>
      <category>reviews</category>
      <category>xml</category>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:54:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dzone.com/links/299901.html</guid>
      <dc:creator>markandey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-22T16:54:03Z</dc:date>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href='http://dzone.com/links/rss/googles_chrome_os_is_bad_evolution.html'><img src='http://cdn.dzone.com/images/thumbs/120x90/299901.jpg' style='width:120;height:90;float:left;vertical-align:top;border:1px solid #ccc;' /></a><p style='margin-left: 130px;'>Computing evolved with Desktop computing and then web apps. Browser Based apps are always slow and faulty, they can never as robust as a desktop can be.

After The invention of web services and REST API, I would love to see web enabled desktop Apps. 

I love the concept of Portable Apps , When we mix concept of portable Apps and Cloud Based storage, we can achieve much better results.  BUT Google will never let it happen, they are re-inventing all those age old things again in browser. I have posted a small video response on you tube.<br/><br/><a href='http://dzone.com/links/rss/googles_chrome_os_is_bad_evolution.html'><img src='http://dzone.com/links/voteCountImage?linkId=299901' border='0'/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dz:linkId>299901</dz:linkId>
      <dz:submitDate>2009-11-22T06:46:12Z</dz:submitDate>
      <dz:promoteDate>2009-11-22T16:54:03Z</dz:promoteDate>
      <dz:voteUpCount>17</dz:voteUpCount>
      <dz:voteDownCount>24</dz:voteDownCount>
      <dz:clickCount>921</dz:clickCount>
      <dz:commentCount>7</dz:commentCount>
      <dz:thumbnail>http://dzone.com/links/images/thumbs/120x90/299901.jpg</dz:thumbnail>
      <dz:submitter>
        <dz:username>markandey</dz:username>
        <dz:userimage>http://dzone.com/links/images/avatars/424477.gif</dz:userimage>
      </dz:submitter>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Java &amp; XML: SAX vs. StAX</title>
      <link>http://dzone.com/links/rss/java_xml_sax_vs_stax.html</link>
      <description>This text compares Java's two stream oriented XML parsers, SAX and StAX, and explains the difference in a "push" model and "pull" model. It also lists other differences in these two API's.&#xD;
If you have ever wondered which of these two API's to use, this text may help you decide.</description>
      <category>frameworks</category>
      <category>how-to</category>
      <category>java</category>
      <category>xml</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:44:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dzone.com/links/300905.html</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jakob Jenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-23T16:44:34Z</dc:date>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href='http://dzone.com/links/rss/java_xml_sax_vs_stax.html'><img src='http://cdn.dzone.com/images/thumbs/120x90/300905.jpg' style='width:120;height:90;float:left;vertical-align:top;border:1px solid #ccc;' /></a><p style='margin-left: 130px;'>This text compares Java's two stream oriented XML parsers, SAX and StAX, and explains the difference in a "push" model and "pull" model. It also lists other differences in these two API's.
If you have ever wondered which of these two API's to use, this text may help you decide.<br/><br/><a href='http://dzone.com/links/rss/java_xml_sax_vs_stax.html'><img src='http://dzone.com/links/voteCountImage?linkId=300905' border='0'/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dz:linkId>300905</dz:linkId>
      <dz:submitDate>2009-11-23T07:39:21Z</dz:submitDate>
      <dz:promoteDate>2009-11-23T16:44:34Z</dz:promoteDate>
      <dz:voteUpCount>12</dz:voteUpCount>
      <dz:voteDownCount>0</dz:voteDownCount>
      <dz:clickCount>495</dz:clickCount>
      <dz:commentCount>10</dz:commentCount>
      <dz:thumbnail>http://dzone.com/links/images/thumbs/120x90/300905.jpg</dz:thumbnail>
      <dz:submitter>
        <dz:username>jj83777</dz:username>
        <dz:userimage>http://dzone.com/links/images/avatars/131196.gif</dz:userimage>
      </dz:submitter>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

