Link Details

I agree. I am intrigued by Tapestry but not necessarily a 'fan', but I saw comments asking why Tapestry should exist given that there are things that are 'better' already available. But given this logic, does it mean we should have discourages Struts when pure JSPs were considered 'good enough'?

It may be that Tapestry (or even the current version) isn't the final step towards component driven web sites, but I'd hate to think that this was taken as reason not to try.

I did quite a lot of Tapestry 4 some year/years ago, and it was absolutely perfect for my needs. Then I started drifting towards moving more of the functionality into the browser, and all of a sudden I didn't need a web layer on the server anymore. But if I ever again code something on the server it will be Tapestry.