The 0th Trap of Teams
The 0th Trap of Teams
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
See why over 50,000 companies trust Jira Software to plan, track, release, and report great software faster than ever before. Try the #1 software development tool used by agile teams.
“If you call a tail a leg, how many legs has a dog? Five? No, calling a tail a leg don’t make it a leg.” Abraham Lincoln
The zeroeth trap of teams is calling any old group of people a team and then expecting teamwork and collaboration. A team is a social organization, a group of people who work collaboratively to accomplish some goal. Every team is a group of people, but not every group of people is a team. In order to be a team, a group needs to fit these criteria.
- Share a compelling work goal, one that is well-understood by all members of the team. They result they are producing is eagerly awaited by some person or persons–else there is no reason for the team. Without goal outside the team, a group may form a social unit, but they are not a team.
- Are mutually accountable for that goal. Team members do focus on completing their work; but they know that completing individual task isn’t success. Success comes from achieving the over all goal.
- Are doing interdependent work that requires the skills of all to create a finished product. Their skills are complementary and it is the combination of their skills that enables them to reach their goal. It’s not like a ski team where everyone has the same skills, and the team result is the sum of individual scores. On a team, the results aren’t additive, they’re integrative, generative, and collective.
- Have a shared approach (though not a rigid process). Team members make agreements on how they will work together. They choose methods that fit the work and the goal. They need enough constraints on process so that they can work creatively–avoiding both anarchy and stifling routine.
- Teams almost always have fewer than ten members. Some say five is the sweet spot. When there are fewer than five members, there’s not much sense of teaminess. When there are more than ten, the work is so big that it breaks on along natural lines…and so do the people, falling into sub-groups that act more like a team than the bigger unit.
- Have shared history/identity. This implies that a group is not a team on it’s first day together. It also implies that shaking up groups every few weeks or months ensures that you’ll never really achieve the surpassing results that cohesive teams are capable of.
Fit for Function: Different work calls for different types of organization
Some work is much better done by a team, some work needs a group, and some needs many same-skilled individuals. It depends on the how interdependent and tightly coupled the work is. Growing teams takes energy and commitment–both from team member and managers. If the work doesn’t require cross-functional collaboration on a day-to-day basis, the work doesn’t need a team. (But beware of inappropriate serialization.)
Published at DZone with permission of Esther Derby , DZone MVB. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.