3 Pitfalls Everyone Should Avoid With Hybrid Multicloud (Part 4)
Just as there are considerations for moving you applications to the cloud, here are some things to consider when thinking about your data.
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
From cloud, hybrid cloud, to hybrid multi-cloud, you're told this is the way to ensure a digital future for your business. These choices you've got to make don't preclude the daily work of enhancing your customer's experience and agile delivery of those applications.
Let's take a journey, looking closely at what hybrid multi-cloud means for your business. Let's examine the decisions being made when delivering applications and dealing with legacy applications. Likely, these are some of the most important resources to your business.
This article highlights three pitfalls everyone should be aware of when transitioning into hybrid multi-cloud environments. It's based on experiences from interactions with organizations working to conquer hybrid multi-cloud while delivering their solutions.
In part one, we covered the basic definitions to level the playing field. We outlined our views on hybrid cloud and multi-cloud, making sure to show the dividing lines between the two. This set the stage for part two, where the first pitfall discussed why cost is not always the obvious motivator for moving to the cloud. Determining if moving all workloads to the cloud is viable was explored in part three.
Finally, in part four, we look at what to do with your data in the cloud. Should you move data into the cloud? How much? What data in the cloud works and what is too much of a rick for the cloud?
Data, Data, Data
The first thing about cloud and data, the crucial factor to all your decisions, is determining your bandwidth and storage needs.
A recent article stated that, "based on Gartner's projection that data storage will be a $173 billion business in 2018." This has caught your attention as you're looking to push workloads and storage into the cloud.
The article goes even further to state that, "Companies globally could save $62 billion in IT costs just by optimizing their workloads." After reading the previous articles in this series, you should not be surprised at this statement. What is surprising follows when they state that, "Only 25% of companies would save money if they transferred their server data directly onto the cloud."
Wait a minute, workloads can be optimized for the cloud, but only a small percentage of companies would save on data in the cloud?
If you consider that cloud providers often charge rates based on bandwidth, moving your data from on-premise to the cloud quickly becomes a cost burden you don't want to carry. Putting data in the cloud is a rare occurrence, usually something like this:
- A single cloud with storage and applications
- Applications in cloud with storage on-premise
- Applications in the cloud and their data cached in cloud, storage on-premise
In the first, bandwidth costs are reduced by keeping everything inside a single cloud vendor, which we know is simply lock-in and often not part of a CIO's cloud strategy or risk prevention.
The second only keeps data in the cloud that applications collect and transports out the minimum down to on-premise storage. This creates a carefully considered strategy of only deploying data minimalistic applications in a cloud.
The last example is where data is cached in the cloud with applications and storage of that data, or the one truth, is stored on premise. This means analytics, AI, and machine learning can be run on-premise without having to upload to cloud providers and then back again after processing. The cached data is based only on application needs and can even be cached across multi-cloud deployments.
The Amsterdam Airport Schiphol case study is available online and discusses their data, cloud, and deployment strategies across a hybrid multi-cloud environment.
Most companies realize all too well that their data is their proprietary advantage in their market. It's their intellectual capital at the end of the day and something they've thought very carefully about in regards to where it's going to be stored.
Imagine this scenario if you will.
You're a retailer, one of the top ten worldwide. You've been planning your cloud strategy for some time now and have landed on making use of Amazon's cloud services. All of a sudden, Amazon buys Whole Foods and is moving into your market.
Overnight Amazon has now grown to 50% of your retail size. Do you trust their cloud with your retail data? What do you do if you already have your data in their cloud? Did your cloud planning start with having an exit strategy?
Pitfalls Shared, Pitfalls Avoided
Sharing just a few of the pitfalls we have seen in our travels should help your company plan for a safer, more secure and persistent cloud strategy. Understanding that cost is not the obvious motivator, that not everything needs or should be put in the cloud, and managing your data effectively in the cloud are all key factors to ensuring success.
Missing the start of this series? Just head on back and catch up with part 1.
Published at DZone with permission of Eric D. Schabell, DZone MVB. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.