5 Things Agile Testing Does Differently
Read on to look at the 5 prominent ways in which Agile testing works and serves the development teams differently in the application/software development process.
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
Agile testing methodology has been adopted by enterprises who need continuous changes throughout the software development and testing lifecycle. The practice demands that development and testing activities are conducted alongside each other, which is very differently structured when compared to the Waterfall model. Hence, an Agile testing approach takes a completely different approach as opposted the traditional testing approach.
In reference to Enterprise Agile Planning Tools, Gartner states that, "enterprise Agile planning (EAP) tools help organizations to make use of Agile practices at scale to achieve enterprise-class Agile development. This is achieved by supporting practices that are business outcome-driven, customer-centric, collaborative and cooperative, as well as with continual stakeholder feedback." This practically defines how Agile takes an absolutely distinct approach throughout the development cycle.
In this post, we look at the 5 prominent ways in which Agile testing works and serves the development teams differently in the Application/Software Development process.
1. The Process of Development and Testing Differs
No application can afford to stay static and stagnate in the current digital growth scenario. Hence, there is a lot of focus on Continuous Development, Continuous Integration, and Continuous Growth. This is contrary to the previous practice of development, where testing is conducted towards the end, which indirectly impacts the application development and maintenance activity.
With the continuous state of development, the testing and development teams collaborate within shorter cycles and deliver the task at hand. Consequently, the development process needs open channels of communication, discussions, and interchange of ideas. The initial line of reporting goes to the Scrum team and later to the respective testing and development teams.
2. Agile Testing Cannot Be Done Without Using Tools
Testing and development teams need tools to support the continuous development and testing activities. The tools enable teams to automate and confirm that the previously implemented changes are not impacted by the recent ones. This involves test data generation tools, white-box testing tools, and data analytics tools, which are necessary in an Agile ecosystem. Moreover, tools enable teams to define testing targets and work towards it with backtracking facilities. Automation of activities enable teams to keep pace with the Sprints by automating various features.
This helps them to make frequent changes and implement the same on a continuous basis. The tools further enable collaborative working and contributions from all through the testing and development activities.
3. Cross-Functional Teams with Diverse Skills Are Needed in An Agile Approach
As we have discussed, Agile testing doesn't take the conventional approach, where there is definite segmentation and hierarchical progression of the tasks. It needs collaboration across all teams and takes a parallel reporting structure. Hence, teams have to develop cross-functional capabilities, as there are definite chances that roles could get interchanged during the development or testing process. Even the suggestions related to various aspects within the application can come from team members with different capabilities and roles.
Regular stand-up meetings and open channels of communication make the development process more collaborative and inventive for the application. The Agile tester has a much bigger role to play in the wider set-up, which is to ensure quality and possess skills across the overall spectrum of development.
4. Agile Testing Cannot Function within Closed Communication Channels
Testing becomes the binding force in an Agile scenario, where testers pair up with the developers for sprints. In the process, every member is expected to stay receptive to constant changes and iterations, which could be governed by operational hiccups or client expectations, or related changes. Business agility has to be maintained by ensuring responsiveness.
Even contribution towards the project can come from any corner of the team, which makes constant communication very much necessary in the form of test cases, daily statistics, or defect metrics. An Agile testing team must include excellent communicators for diverse situations.
5. Agile Teams Must Ensure Quick Feedback and Consequent Action
One of the key reasons for considering Agile is to ensure business agility in the form of quicker feedback mechanism and resulting action for the project. With daily stand-ups, design discussions, and reviews with user story verification, teams are able to generate quicker feedback. This helps to reduce the turnaround time that is needed for implementing the changes. Additionally, the team must be equipped and skilled to take up these changes on a continuous basis for implementation.
Only when the changes are implemented continuously, Agile testing will be able to deliver consistent value for enterprises. This can be challenging for organizations and teams who have been working in a traditional development scenario. Hence, a proper retraining/training program is needed before adopting Agile testing practices.
A post by AppDeveloper magazine rightly states, "Agility requires transparency, and there is no way to adapt if you do not have the correct information. If, however, transparency requires an individual to be 'super honest' to the person doing their review, paying their bonus and building their development plan, then it is possible that the facts will always be delivered with a certain 'positive' point of view. This will result in a lack of transparency which in turn will create waste and reduce effectiveness. It is easy to say, 'Be open and honest,' but hard to be that way when your next bonus is perceived to be at risk."
Published at DZone with permission of Hiren Tanna, DZone MVB. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.