A Quick ReactJS Refresher
Enhancements in Angular 2
Angular 2 adds many improvements to the innovations that were introduced in Angular 1. Firstly, Angular 2 has a much higher focus on creating reusable front-end components. While it was possible to do so using Angular 1, version 2 of the framework removes a lot of the barriers to reusability, such as reliance on $scope and on controllers. Directives were also vastly simplified, making Angular 2 code much more concise and readable when compared to Angular 1.x. Angular 2 is also intended to be used with TypeScript, removing a lot of the validation code necessary to enforce type safety. Coupled with many performance and framework improvements, Angular 2 manages to present almost an entirely new look at the declarative front-end framework pattern.
It’s important to note from the get-go that in many ways comparing React to Angular (any version) is comparing apples to oranges. Angular is designed as a front-end framework, providing a full architecture for the client side of your application and allowing you to treat your client code as a robust suite of functionality. React is a library, and much less intrusive in terms of the features offered – it’s intended to be used as a part of a whole, rather than dictating your code’s structure. While this may seem to make a comparison between the two somewhat challenging to conduct, there are enough similarities between the two to drive a fruitful discussion on the advantages and disadvantages of each.
Angular 2, on the other hand, builds upon the opinions introduced in Angular 1, and as a result crystallizes the framework’s view of what the “right way” of developing front-end code should look like. With the focus on components and type safety, Angular 2 allows you to focus on modularizing your code, building an object-oriented front end with a focus on reusability and encapsulation.
From this perspective, React and Angular 2 really don’t compare very strongly – React is the right choice if you’re looking for more flexibility in your code’s architecture, where with Angular 2 you are choosing to essentially adopt an architecture for your application’s front-end as a whole. Which pattern is “better” is ultimately, then, a matter of which fits your application’s design patterns better.
The focus on componentization, though, coupled with the use of TypeScript to build components as coherent functional units, allow you to write your templates in a more generic fashion that can be more reusable and flexible than was possible in Angular 1.x. Ultimately, once you’ve settled into the applicable pattern, the choice is one of aesthetics and underlying functionality – React templates will likely be more compact and quicker to render, but Angular 2 components will likely be more reusable and, through the ever-present two-way data binding, will be easier to manage as application objects.
Angular 2 and React, having different underlying goals, understandably take very different looks at support for native device code when incorporated into mobile apps. The Angular 2 team has opted to focus on the framework itself and left other vendors such as Ionic and NativeScript to handle translating that code into a format runnable on devices. The React ecosystem, on the other hand, has React Native – a framework designed to translate React code into a native application experience, achieving significant performance improvements over more traditional hybrid web apps.
Once again, choosing a “right” approach comes down to the goals of your application. If you’re looking for a blazing fast mobile app experience, React is the clear front runner. However, if you’re looking to maintain a componentized application architecture, and willing to sacrifice some performance to achieve a more consistent code structure, then combining Angular 2 with a framework like Ionic can provide you with all the flexibility you could desire.
The choice between Angular 2 and React comes down to a style preference. React, as a library focused on speed of rendering, is a useful tool for handling large and complex UI presentations in your client or native applications. Angular 2, on the other hand, takes a much broader view of the development process. As an opinionated framework, it’s looking to guide the way in which you build your apps, while also allowing you to create expressive and reusable UI experiences.
Ultimately, the decision will vary based upon the goals of your application, as well as the opinions of your development team. If you favor performance of large complex user interfaces, React is a good choice, while if you want to focus on enhancing the development process and your code’s architecture, Angular 2 will be the right way to go. As always, by understanding your problem space and the needs and desires of your development team, you ultimately won’t be able to make a wrong decision.
Before we end, a shameless plug for Backand. Our backend-as-a-service supports both Angular 2 and React. If you don’t have a free account yet, get one here.