DZone
Java Zone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
  • Refcardz
  • Trend Reports
  • Webinars
  • Zones
  • |
    • Agile
    • AI
    • Big Data
    • Cloud
    • Database
    • DevOps
    • Integration
    • IoT
    • Java
    • Microservices
    • Open Source
    • Performance
    • Security
    • Web Dev
DZone > Java Zone > AOSP's New Restrictions: Will Android 4.5 be a Huge Step Back?

AOSP's New Restrictions: Will Android 4.5 be a Huge Step Back?

Alec Noller user avatar by
Alec Noller
·
Jun. 12, 14 · Java Zone · Interview
Like (0)
Save
Tweet
5.17K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

If you've been tracking the progress of AOSP's development and the move toward Android 4.5, you may have noticed some concerning developments: write access to /system is being limited. According to this overview from Google+ user Chainfire, this has some serious implications:

What this comes down to meaning is that write access to /system is no longer going to be available on "rooted stock" from the Android version these commits are included in.

. . . From a security standpoint, this brings more security, and is thus better. Unlike most of the other AOSP changes I've posted about lately though, this change does not just require devs to update their apps, it will also actively inconvenience root-app users.

It's not certain whether these changes will appear in Android 4.5, but according to this recent post from Homo Ludditus, it's a safe enough assumption that anything happening to AOSP tells us all we need to do about Android in general:

If AOSP 4.5 is screwed, everything Android is screwed.

Unfortunately, if things really are that bad, it won't just be a patch-worthy inconvenience for some apps, but a death sentence:

Rest in peace Titanium Backup, ROM Toolbox, Root Explorer, SD Maid, Lucky Patcher, etc. etc.

And it's hard to say what other impact such changes could have. As the Homo Ludditus post suggests, it could lead to an Android development landscape in which only apps signed by Google could be installed - in other words, Android devices might start to look a lot more like their competitors in some less-than-ideal ways.

Take a look at Chainfire's post and the Homo Ludditus post for a detailed look at the changes.

Android (robot)

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Popular on DZone

  • What Is Kafka? Everything You Need to Know
  • Low Code and No Code: The Security Challenge
  • How to Submit a Post to DZone
  • Which Backend Frameworks Are Impacting Web App Development Immensely?

Comments

Java Partner Resources

X

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Send feedback
  • Careers
  • Sitemap

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • MVB Program
  • Become a Contributor
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 600 Park Offices Drive
  • Suite 300
  • Durham, NC 27709
  • support@dzone.com
  • +1 (919) 678-0300

Let's be friends:

DZone.com is powered by 

AnswerHub logo