DZone
Web Dev Zone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
  • Refcardz
  • Trend Reports
  • Webinars
  • Zones
  • |
    • Agile
    • AI
    • Big Data
    • Cloud
    • Database
    • DevOps
    • Integration
    • IoT
    • Java
    • Microservices
    • Open Source
    • Performance
    • Security
    • Web Dev
DZone > Web Dev Zone > Are Vendor Prefixes Harmful?

Are Vendor Prefixes Harmful?

John Esposito user avatar by
John Esposito
·
Nov. 16, 11 · Web Dev Zone · Interview
Like (0)
Save
Tweet
3.24K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

Standardization is good, but rigid standardization is bad: no standards body knows every use case, and browsermakers need to respond flexibly to user needs.

The result is the chicken-and-egg of adoption. But there are solutions.

One is the vendor prefixing system, first developed by the CSS working group. The idea is: while a standard is still developing, let vendors do their best to interpret the nascent standards as they presently stand -- but mark their own particular interpretation clearly with a prefix indicating the vendor.

As you may have guessed, the goal of vendor prefixes is a little more complex -- since the whole reason to create standards in the first place is to prevent browsers from talking totally different languages, or meaning completely different things by the same words.

But Henri Sivonen thinks vendor prefixes are a terrible idea. Many of his objections aren't new -- Peter-Paul Koch raised a number of similar objections over a year ago (see redux too) -- but Henri's post is more up-to-date, pre-emptively counters a number of possible objections, then responds to a number of counter-counter objections posted in the comments.

Here's Henri's own tl;dr summary:

TL;DR: I think vendor prefixes are hurting the Web. They are hurting Web authors. They are hurting users of browsers. They are hurting competition in the Web browser space. I think we (people developing browsers and Web standards) should stop hurting the Web. It would also make sense for browsers to implement other browsers’ prefixed features to the extent existing content uses prefixed features.


Henri's full explanation is definitely worth reading.

David Glazman, co-chairman of the CSS working group, responded quickly -- and while David isn't happy with the tone of the original post, he does agree with many of Henri's specific points (though often for slightly different reasons).

The vendor prefixes dispute does touch on some deep issues regarding web standardization, so hearing variant takes is quite intriguing -- even if you don't worry too much about vendor prefixes in your own coding.

 

CSS POST (HTTP) Extent (file systems) Dispute (credit card) Space (architecture) Coding (social sciences) Adoption

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Popular on DZone

  • SSH Tutorial: Nice and Easy [Video]
  • Five Tips to Fasten Your Skewed Joins in Apache Spark
  • Common Types Of Network Security Vulnerabilities In 2022
  • The Developer's Guide to SaaS Compliance

Comments

Web Dev Partner Resources

X

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Send feedback
  • Careers
  • Sitemap

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • MVB Program
  • Become a Contributor
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 600 Park Offices Drive
  • Suite 300
  • Durham, NC 27709
  • support@dzone.com
  • +1 (919) 678-0300

Let's be friends:

DZone.com is powered by 

AnswerHub logo