Artificial Reasoning: Inside Machine Learning
Let's take a look inside Machine Learning and explore the differences in how humans correlate things vs. how machines correlate things.
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
You are sitting in an exit row. You casually look at the emergency guide, and it is a combination of images and text. Your brain naturally combines them and presents you with a complete picture of the intended message — open the door in the unlikely event of an emergency.
As humans, this ability to correlate comes instinctively to us, but for a minute, think about how a computer sees the same document. An OCR (optical character recognition) system reads the text. An image recognition model scans the image. Then, there is a third system that correlates the image and text to understand the complete picture.
The two approaches for completing the same task seem drastically different. However, if you think about it, the fundamental principles are same, the human process of analyzing the world around us and the approach a machine takes to process complex information are both based on breaking down the data to its core elements. We are just instinctively better at correlating the information.
In my previous post on Artificial Creativity, I argued the how AI systems are challenging our notions on creativity. Even though the current pragmatic AI systems cannot replace our true creativity, they can certainly simulate creative endeavors in humans. It can suggest that bacon goes with a cocktail. It is still up to us to decide whether we like it or not (I say "meh" on the whole bacon in the cocktail suggestion.)
In this relentless pursuit of artificial intelligence augmented capabilities, one key capability has been somewhat elusive — reasoning. The sheer complexity of correlations needed to present a convincing argument is hard for most humans, let alone AI systems.
That's just changed. IBM recently demonstrated Project Debater that argued with expert debaters on multiple topics and won (arguably).
We are now at a point where the ability to reason can be taught to a machine. Will it soon make better business sense as we delegate basic reasoning and decision making to these systems? What does it mean for us? Do we become obsolete? Does an old Ford become irrelevant because Tesla exists?
I actually don't think so.
It is an opportunity for us to evolve to an even higher function where the definitions of our fundamental institutions no longer hold. It frees our cognitive capacity to seek out new frontiers in science, philosophy, health care, and education. It's a win-win!
Artificial Intelligence: Fact, Fiction. How Enterprises Can Crush It
Published at DZone with permission of Tanmay Sinha, DZone MVB. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.