So I was refactoring some code to use non-locking collection classes and I noticed this significant difference between ConcurrentMap.computeIfAbsent and ConcurrentHashMap.computeIfAbsent. The key difference is that for the former, default implementing the mapping function can be called many times for a particular key, whereas for the concrete implementation it will be called only once.
Right, okay, so armed with that you know that any collection that implements just ConcurrentMap will inherit this behavior; further to that I found in particular that Guava would return a different implementation depending on the passed on parameters:
ConcurrentMap map1 = new MapMaker().makeMap(); System.out.println(map1.getClass()); ConcurrentMap map2 = new MapMaker().weakKeys().makeMap(); System.out.println(map2.getClass()); .... class java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap class com.google.common.collect.MapMakerInternalMap
MapMakerInternalMap doesn't override computerIfAbsent, therefore the behaviour of this function will be significantly different depending on the parameters to pass into the maker, something that might not be apparent from the get go.