Cloud Computing Platform Comparison: (part 1)
Cloud Computing Platform Comparison: (part 1)
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
How to Transform Your Business in the Digital Age: Learn how organizations are re-architecting their integration strategy with data-driven app integration for true digital transformation.
"Cloud computing" is one of the hot topics these days. Especially with the economy downturn, enterprises are looking every opportunity to reduce their spending. Cloud computing provides a number of attractions ...
- Since resource capacity can be provisioned just in a few clicks, enterprises no longer need to budget for their peak load. They just need budget for the average load (rather than the peak load) and rent for extra resources from the cloud during peak traffic period. This is huge savings for them.
- By outsourcing the operation environment, enterprise pass the problem of load balancing, fail recovery to the cloud provider. They no longer need to maintain their inhouse IT expertise which is required for running their web sites. This is also huge savings.
There are primarily two architectural models of how cloud providers deliver their services: the IaaS and PaaS model.
IaaS – Infrastructure as a Service
The IaaS model take a very bottom-up approach and focus in just providing a “virtual machine”.
IaaS model give the enterprise all the freedom to pick any technology that suits their organization skills sets, budget and particular deployment scenarios.
Since existing technology stack can be used in the cloud without any change, existing applications can be migrated to the cloud almost transparently. This is very attractive to enterprise who wants to enjoy the cost benefits that cloud computing provides without requiring them to make a lot of changes to their existing applications. On the other hand, it is very easy to migrate back from the cloud to internal IT. There is less concern of being lock-in.
However, the freedom also comes with a cost. Since there is a lot of infrastructure decision (such as load balancing, fail recovery) still need to be figured out, the user’s organization need to retain pretty much same amount of IT expertise to make these decisions and operate it.
PaaS – Platform as a Service
PaaS model takes a different approach in that they are not just covering the lowest machine layer but also provides rich technology in the upper technology stacks based the vendor's experience in running large scale websites. Enterprises can keep their focus in developing business logic and not worry about how the infrastructure should be setup.
The downside of PaaS is that enterprises has to write their application in specific language and API which is predefined by the cloud provider. That means existing application have to be first rewritten before they can be run inside PaaS. Also, to a high degree, the written application will be locked in to the cloud provider’s particular technology stack.
We predict PaaS model to be more attractive to small companies and startups who are primarily green field development and want to quickly deliver their features without worrying too much about infrastructure setup. On the other hand, larger enterprise who have more legacy system, or companies who just wants to test out cloud computing with minimum effort, or those who concern about vendor’s lock-in, will find IaaS to be much more attractive.
Amazon Web Services
Amazon is the current leader of Cloud provider based on the IaaS model. At the heart of its technology stack, they have the virtual machine layer called EC2. Amazon also provides a set of surrounding services for data storage, metadata storage, message queues, payment processing, content cache … etc.
EC2 – Elastic Computing
Amazon has procured a large number of commoditized Intel boxes running virtualization software Xen. On top of Xen, Linux or Windows can be run as the guest OS . The guest operating system can have many variations with different set of software packages installed.
Each configuration is bundled as a custom machine image (called AMI). Amazon host a catalog of AMI for the users to choose from. Some AMI is free while other requires a usage charge. User can also customize their own setup by starting from a standard AMI, make their special configuration changes and then create a specific AMI that is customized for their specific needs. The AMIs are stored in Amazon’s storage subsystem S3.
Amazon also classifies their machines in terms of their processor power (no of cores, memory and disk size) and charged their usage at a different rate. These machines can be run in different network topology specified by the users. There is an “availability zone” concept which is basically a logical data center. “Availability zone” has no interdependency and is therefore very unlikely to fail at the same time. To achieve high availability, users should consider putting their EC2 instances in different availability zones.
“Security Group” is the virtual firewall of Amazon EC2 environment. EC2 instances can be grouped under “security group” which specifies which port is open to which incoming range of IP addresses. So EC2 instances that running applications at various level of security requirements can be put into appropriated security groups and managed using ACL (access control list). Somewhat very similar to what network administrator configure their firewalls.
User can start the virtual machine (called an EC2 instance) by specifying the AMI, the machine size, the security group, and its authentication key via command line or an HTTP/XML message. So it is very easy to startup the virtual machine and start running the user’s application. When the application completes, the user can also shutdown the EC2 instance via command line or HTTP/XML message. The user is only charged for the actual time when the EC2 instance is running.
One of the issue of extremely dynamic machine configuration (such as EC2) is that a lot of configuration setting is transient and does not survive across reboot. For example, the node name and IP address may have been changed, all the data stored in local files is lost. Latency and network bandwidth between machines may also have changed. Fortunately, Amazon provides a number of ways to mitigate these issues.
- By paying some charge, user can reserve a stable IP address, called “elastic IP”, which can be attached to EC2 instance after they bootup. External facing machine is typically done this way.
- To deal with data persistence, Amazon also provides a logical network disk, called “elastic block storage” to store the data. By paying some charges, EBS is reserved for the user and it survives across EC2 reboots. User can attach the EBS to EC2 instances after the reboot.
S3 – Simple Storage Service
Amazon S3 provides a HTTP/XML services to save and retrieve content. It provides a file system-like metaphor where “objects” are group under “buckets”. Based on a REST design, each object and bucket has its own URL.
With HTTP verbs (PUT, GET, DELETE, POST), user can create a bucket, list all the objects within the bucket, create object within a bucket, retrieve an object, remove an object, remove a bucket … etc.
Under S3, each object has a unique URI which serves as its key. There is no query mechanism in S3 and User has to lookup the object by its key. Each object is stored as an opaque byte array with maximum 5GB size. S3 also provides an interesting partial object retrieval mechanism by specifying the ranges of bytes in the URL.
However, partial put is not current support but it can be simulated by breaking the large object into multiple small objects and then do the assembly at the app level. Breaking down the object also help to speed up the upload and download by doing the data transfer in parallel.
Within Amazon S3, each S3 objects are replicated across 2 (or more) data center and also cache at the edge for fast retrieval.
Amazon S3 is based on an “eventual consistent” model which means it is possible that an application won’t see the change it just made. Therefore, some degree of tolerance of inconsistent view is required by the application. Application should avoid the situation of having two concurrent modifications to the same object. And application should wait for some time between updates, and also should expect all the data it reads is potentially stale for few seconds.
There is also no versioning concept in S3, but it is not hard to build one on top of S3.
EBS – Elastic Block Storage
Based on RAID disks, EBS provides a persistent block storage device for data persistence where user can attach it to a running EC2 instance within the same availability zone. EBS is typically used as a file system that is mounted to EC2 instance, or as raw devices for database.
Although EBS is a network devices to the EC2 instance, benchmark from Amazon shows that it has higher performance than local disk access. Unlike S3 which is based on eventual consistent model, EBS provides strict consistency where latest updates are immediately available.
SimpleDB – queriable data storage
Unlike S3 where data has to be looked up by key, SimpleDB provides a semi-structured data store with querying capability. Each object can be stored as a number of attributes where the user can search the object by the attribute name.
Similar to the concepts of “buckets “ and “objects” in S3, SimpleDB is organized as a set of “items” grouped by “domains”. However, each item can have a number of “attributes” (up to 256). Each attribute can store one or multiple values and the value must be a string (or a string array in case of multi-valued attribute). Each attribute can store up to 1K bytes, so it is not appropriate to store binary content.
SimpleDB is typically used as a metadata store in conjuction with S3 where the actual data is being stored. SimpleDB is also schema-less. Each item can define its own set of attributes and is free to add more or remove some attributes at runtime.
SimpleDB provides a query capability which is quite different from SQL. The “where” clause can only match an attribute value with a constant but not with other attributes. On the other hand, the query result only return the name of the matched items but not the attributes, which means subsequent lookup by item name is needed. Also, there is no equivalent of “order by” and the returned query result is unsorted.
Since all attribute are store as strings (even number, dates … etc). All comparison operation is done based on lexical order. Therefore, special encoding is needed for data type such as date, number to string to make sure comparison operation is done correctly.
SimpleDB is also based on an eventual consistency model like S3.
SQS – Simple Queue Service
Amazon provides a queue services for application to communicate in an asynchronous way with each other. Message (up to 256KB size) can be sent to queues. Each queue is replicated across multiple data centers.
Enterprises use HTTP protocol to send messages to a queue. “At least once” semantics is provided, which means, when the sender get back a 200 OK response, SQS guarantees that the message will be received by at least one receiver.
Receiving messages from a queue is done by polling rather than event driven calling interface. Since messages are replicated across queues asynchronously, it is possible that receivers only get some (but not all) messages sent to the queue. But the receiver keep polling the queue, he will eventually get all messages sent to the queue. On the other hand, message can be delivered out of order or delivered more than once. So the message processing logic needs to be idempotent as well as independent of message arrival order.
Once message is taken by a receiver, the message is invisible to other receivers for a period of time but it is not gone yet. The original receiver is supposed to process the message and make an explicit call to remove the message permanently from the queue. If such “removal” request is not made within the timeout period, the message will be visible in the queue again and will be picked up by subsequent receivers.
Things to watch out
While Amazon AWS provides a very transparent model for enterprise to migrate their existing IT infrastructure, there are a number of limitations that needs to pay attention to …
- Multicast communication is not supported between EC2 instances. This means application has to communicate using TCP point-to-point protocol. Some cluster replication framework based on IP multicast simply doesn’t work in EC2 environment.
- EBS currently can be attached to a single EC2 instance. This means some application (e.g. Oracle cluster) which based on having multiple machines accessing a shared disk simply won’t work in EC2 environment.
- Amazon doesn’t provide a load balancing mechanism which is very common to web site setup. User need to figure out their own load balancing mechanism, either by providing its own load balancer and spread the load across EC2 instances, or running a software implemented load balancer in an EC2 instance.
- Information available from the monitoring UI is also very primitive at this moment. There is no tool provided by Amazon to automatically launch more EC2 instances based on workload conditions. User has to do this themselves.
- Except EC2, using any of the other API that Amazon provides is lock-in to Amazon’s technology stack. This issue may be somewhat mitigated as there are open source clone (e.g. Eucalyptus) to the Amazon AWS services
In my upcoming posts, I will cover other cloud providers such as Salesforce, Google ... etc.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.