Over a million developers have joined DZone.

Committed to Open Source

· Java Zone

Navigate the Maze of the End-User Experience and pick up this APM Essential guide, brought to you in partnership with CA Technologies

When Oracle announced it would no longer offer commercial support for future versions of GlassFish, many people started to "defend" Open Source and blame Oracle. More important than this particular example, I think it is about time that the software industry starts to re-think about how to work with Open Source developers and Open Source technologies.

The best blog entry I've read on this subject, is this article from David Blevins: http://www.tomitribe.com/blog/2013/11/feed-the-fish/. If you didn't read it yet, I highly recommend doing so. I completely agree with his analysis. I hear similar sounds outside the Java EE area as well, and I am worried about this. It appears the industry has created a culture where it is assumed that some geeks will spend all their spare time to "Open Source" products. If those geeks somehow want to be refunded, they are not cool anymore. The industry decided that they have to start a consulting company around their Open Source products. That is valid business model, and to be honest, at LodgON, we're actually doing this with DataFX, the Open Source JavaFX enterprise framework I co-develop. DataFX is all open and free, but we offer commercial support for companies that want to integrate it in their own products or projects.

To be honest, I think forcing open-source developers in this area is a bad idea. It can be a success story though. Some of the brightest open-source developers are capable of starting a company, e.g. look at what my old cohort Dries Buytaert did: after founding Drupal, he co-created Acquia and Acquia is now a leading technology company. That is great, and I have lots of respect for developers like Dries that also have skills for creating a company, an organization and a culture.

Other developers, however, don't have the skills or simply the interest in doing this. They want to do what they are good at: writing code. Those people are often very bad in marketing themselves. Those people often spend lots of time in writing code, in answering questions on forums, in talking about their passion on conferences,... but they don't get a proper reward for it. At the contrary, they might get blamed on forums for not implementing new features fast enough, or by not answering soon enough. Nevertheless, their value to our software heritage can not be underestimated. It is time the industry shows more respect to them. Geeks have to pay their bills as well.

There is an alternative, where a single company funds an Open Source project. This is what happened with GlassFish, and that failed. As David Blevins wrote in his blog entry: "Not even IBM or Oracle can pick up the bill for Open Source forever." Open Source needs the involvement from a community (apart from potential involvement from one or a few companies), but the community somehow need to be rewarded for this.

Thrive in the application economy with an APM model that is strategic. Be E.P.I.C. with CA APM.  Brought to you in partnership with CA Technologies.

Topics:

Published at DZone with permission of Johan Vos, DZone MVB. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

The best of DZone straight to your inbox.

SEE AN EXAMPLE
Please provide a valid email address.

Thanks for subscribing!

Awesome! Check your inbox to verify your email so you can start receiving the latest in tech news and resources.
Subscribe

{{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}

{{ parent.tldr }}

{{ parent.urlSource.name }}