Compact Strings in Java 9

DZone 's Guide to

Compact Strings in Java 9

Want to lower the footprint of your Java app? See how you can boost performance by making use of compact strings, enabled by Java 9.

· Java Zone ·
Free Resource

One of the performance enhancements introduced in the JVM (Oracle HotSpot to be specific) as part of Java SE 9 is compact strings. It aims to reduce the size of String objects, hence reducing the overall footprint of Java applications. As a result, it can also reduce the time spent on garbage collection.

The feature is based on the observation that most String objects do not need 2 bytes to encode every character, because most applications use only Latin-1 characters. Hence, instead of having:

/** The value is used for character storage. */
private final char value[];

java.lang.String now has:

private final byte[] value;
 * The identifier of the encoding used to encode the bytes in
 * {@code value}. The supported values in this implementation are
 * UTF16
 * @implNote This field is trusted by the VM, and is a subject to
 * constant folding if String instance is constant. Overwriting this
 * field after construction will cause problems.
private final byte coder;

In other words, this feature replaces the char array value (where each element uses 2 bytes) with a byte array with an extra byte to determine the encoding (Latin-1 or UTF-16). This means that for most applications that use only Latin-1 characters, only half the previous amount of heap is used. This feature is completely invisible to the user, and related APIs such as StringBuilder automatically make use of it.

To demonstrate this change in terms of the size used by a String object, I’ll be using Java Object Layout, a simple utility that can be used to visualize the structure of an object in the heap. For that matter, we are interested in determining the footprint of the array (stored in the variable value above), and not simply the reference (both a byte array reference and a char array reference use 4 bytes). The following prints this information using a JOL GraphLayout:

public class JOLSample {

    public static void main(String[] args) {

Running the above against Java 8 and then against Java 9 shows the difference:

$java -version
java version "1.8.0_121"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_121-b13)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.121-b13, mixed mode)

$java -cp lib\jol-cli-0.9-full.jar;. test.JOLSample
java.lang.String@4554617cd footprint:
     COUNT       AVG       SUM   DESCRIPTION
         1       432       432   [C
         1        24        24   java.lang.String
         2                 456   (total)


$java -version
java version "9"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9+181)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9+181, mixed mode)

$java -cp lib\jol-cli-0.9-full.jar;. test.JOLSample
java.lang.String@73035e27d footprint:
     COUNT       AVG       SUM   DESCRIPTION
         1       224       224   [B
         1        24        24   java.lang.String
         2                 248   (total)

Ignoring the 24-byte size of the internals of java.lang.String (header plus references), we see the size reduced to almost half with string compaction.

If we change the above String to use a UTF-16 character such as \u0780, and then re-run the above, both Java 8 and Java 9 show the same footprint because the compaction no longer occurs.

This feature can be disabled by passing the option -XX:-CompactStrings to the java command.

compact strings, garbage collection, java, java 9, java performance, tutorial

Published at DZone with permission of Mahmoud Anouti , DZone MVB. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

{{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}

{{ parent.tldr }}

{{ parent.urlSource.name }}