Over a million developers have joined DZone.

Continuous Integration for Mobile vs. Web Applications

DZone's Guide to

Continuous Integration for Mobile vs. Web Applications

The differences between integrating continuous integration into your development process for web and mobile apps.

· DevOps Zone ·
Free Resource

Download the blueprint that can take a company of any maturity level all the way up to enterprise-scale continuous delivery using a combination of Automic Release Automation, Automic’s 20+ years of business automation experience, and the proven tools and practices the company is already leveraging.

Hybrid frameworks such as Cordova and Ionic have firmly entrenched themselves as compelling options for mobile application development. Leveraging their power, sophisticated cross-platform mobile apps can now be written in HTML, CSS and JavaScript. This has been most welcome news to web developers, whose toolchains are typically built around these three core technologies. With the barrier to entry thus practically eliminated, and with the seemingly unstoppable growth of mobile, there is little excuse for a web developer not to add mobile app building to his or her arsenal.

While the transition from web to mobile still takes some effort and requires learning new techniques, many of the concepts and approaches carry over. Particularly, developers who have relied on continuous integration in their web work will be delighted to learn that CI is very much present on the mobile side. However, while the CI concept remains the same, its practicalities are somewhat different. It’s a good idea to become aware of these differences right from the outset.

Laying the Foundation

When developing mobile applications, you can - nay, should - check the code into a version control system, make use of remote repository hosting, and write a variety of tests. These foundational building blocks of continuous integration are well familiar to web developers with CI experience. The next step is to choose a CI service and set it up so that each push to the remote repo triggers an application build. Our strong opinion, borne from years of first-hand experience, is that choosing a CI solution dedicated to mobile development is essential for developer happiness. If you choose Greenhouse as your CI service, you’ll find the setup process to be quick and painless and to require the minimum of hands-on effort. (And if you do get stuck along the way, our docs will guide you through.)

So far, the mobile CI workflow mirrors that of web development: you write some code, commit, push, then watch the CI service fetch your repo, install dependencies, build your app and test it. The next step for a web app would be to deploy the application to a hosting service, making the new version of the web application immediately available to the public. This is not how things work for mobile.


The difference at the deployment stage comes down the distribution model. In many ways, mobile apps take us back to the days of shipping shrink-wrapped CDs for each new version of our software. A single copy of your web application used to be the only thing needed to make it available to the entire world. By contrast, hundreds, thousands and (hopefully) millions of copies of your mobile app will need to be delivered to users’ phones. And while you had full control of the deployment pipeline for your web app, someone else is in charge of the mobile distribution channels and you have to be ready to play by their rules.

To begin with, all mobile platforms have a set of guidelines to which all apps must adhere to be accepted into the official stores. For an example, you can take a look at Google’s. Apple goes a step further and requires your app’s code to be signed. For this purpose, you will need to obtain a digital certificate and a provisioning profile from Apple. Since Greenhouse won’t be able to do much with your code without these, we will ask you to upload them if we detect that your project targets the iOS platform.

Once your app meets all the necessary requirements of one or multiple mobile platforms, the next step is to get it into Apple’s and Google’s walled gardens. While using a CI service such as Greenhouse cannot shortcut this, it can make things significantly less painful by automating the key steps. Once a build completes successfully, Greenhouse can automatically publish your build artefacts - i.e. distribution packages for Android and/or iOS - to relevant channels. For instance, you can set up our CI to send your successful release builds directly to iTunes Connect - Apple’s pipeline for submitting apps to the App Store.

Beta Testing

In addition to the release channels described above, you may wish to publish your builds elsewhere. Most web developers are familiar with the concept of environments - “dev” for development work, “staging” for testing by a small group of users or a client, and “master” for wide distribution to the public. Same concepts apply to mobile development, and it’s only the “master” branch of your project that you’ll want to submit to Apple or Google. Before that, you’ll want to have the beta version of the app evaluated by your teammates or - if you have them - dedicated beta-testers. There are several ways in which Greenhouse can help you get the app on their phones. The simplest by far is to configure our CI to send the app via email to the addresses you provide. While this is very straight-forward, you can get a lot more out of your beta testers if you connect with them via a third party such as HockeyAppCrashlytics, or TestFairy. These services will not only help you with distribution but can also monitor crashes, provide detailed reports, and collect user feedback. Here, too, Greenhouse has your back with optional automatic publishing to all three plus the latest support addition for Google Play publishing.

Supporting Legacy Code

Once again, it feels like we’re going back in time. “Fragmentation” was not a concept that applied to web applications, but mobile brings it roaring back. Just because an awesome new version of your app is available, there is no reason to expect your entire user base to install it ASAP. (But you won’t have to wait too long before seeing their 1-star reviews pour in!) Having to do upgrade testing and supporting multiple versions of your software simultaneously are not happy tasks no matter how you slice it. Luckily, a good mobile-oriented CI service (ahem, Greenhouse) can help here by keeping a reliable version record of the binaries it builds. You can then use these as reference when handling user issues.


Here’s a quick summary of the key differences between web and mobile CI you should be aware of before getting started:

WEB CI Mobile CI
Deployment Deploy to live instantly Submit to store for approval
No code signing May need to upload certificates to CI
Beta testing Deploy to staging and invite users Distribute build via email or 3rd party
Legacy version support N/A: newest version instantly available for all Use CI to keep track of binaries versions for reference

No matter what kinds of mobile apps you are building and what your background is, you will doubtless find that a continuous integration service tailored to mobile development is a powerful tool. It can take care of mundane and error-prone tasks and let you spend more time doing what you love - writing code. As with any tool, proper understanding of how CI works within a particular setup is critical to getting the most out of it without undue effort and frustration.

Download the ‘Practical Blueprint to Continuous Delivery’ to learn how Automic Release Automation can help you begin or continue your company’s digital transformation.

continious integration ,beta testing ,mobile testing ,test automation ,continuous delivery

Published at DZone with permission of

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

{{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}

{{ parent.tldr }}

{{ parent.urlSource.name }}