Over a million developers have joined DZone.
{{announcement.body}}
{{announcement.title}}

Dealing With Difficult Stakeholders and Team Members

DZone's Guide to

Dealing With Difficult Stakeholders and Team Members

Is there someone on your Scrum team who's just hard to work with? Read on to get some advice on how to approach the matter.

· Agile Zone
Free Resource

See how three solutions work together to help your teams have the tools they need to deliver quality software quickly. Brought to you in partnership with CA Technologies

“You just can’t make up your mind. I really wish that for once, you gave us clear priorities,” Jane said accusingly at the end of the workshop and walked out of the room. It felt like a slap in the face, an unprovoked attack. How could she say something like that?

Does this story sound familiar? I certainly find that as product managers and product owners, we sometimes have to deal with pushy, stressed, or unhelpful stakeholders and team members—with people who are just being difficult.

If we reflect on the nature of our work, then this shouldn’t come as a surprise: product management is as much about people as it is about products. Friction and conflict commonly appear when people from different departments work together. What’s more, innovation and effective teamwork are only possible if we can leverage conflict and disagreement. 

Don’t Ignore the Conflict

It would be easy to brush aside the issue and forget what Jane said. With so many things competing for your attention, should you really worry about Jane’s remark? But what would happen if you did ignore the conflict?

Chances are that you would feel aversion towards Jane, even if you are not fully aware of it. Next time you meet, this might cause you to say something you later regret, which would only make things worse. What’s more, tolerating bad behavior sets a precedent and creates an unhealthy work atmosphere; disrespect invites disrespect.

Therefore, do not ignore conflict. See it as an opportunity to improve your product management and leadership skills. This, of course, is sometimes easier said than done: addressing the issue requires courage. Jane might be a powerful or influential individual, like a senior manager or stakeholder. Additionally, you have to be willing to honestly reflect on your own intentions and actions, and be open to change your behavior.

Regain Your Composure

When exposed to unkind behavior, it can be hard for me not to lose my calm. But before responding to Jane and telling her what you think, stop and reflect. Become aware of how you are feeling. Are you disappointed, upset, or angry? If so, then that’s ok. But bear in mind that negative thoughts and emotions cloud your perception; they will make it difficult to have a constructive conversation with Jane.

What’s more, negativity affects your own wellbeing; it makes you unhappy. Holding on to anger, a wise man once said, is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of harming someone else: the only thing that's certain is that you will get burned. Even if anger, fear, or worries seem to have a tight grip on you, they will weaken and go away if you do not feed them. Acknowledge them, but do not engage with them.

Additionally, think about positive qualities of the difficult person. Jane surely can’t be all bad. Think of moments when you saw Jane help others, make a constructive contribution, or commit other acts of kindness. Remind yourself that anybody who acts in unskilful ways must be unhappy deep inside. This will help you empathize with the difficult person and develop compassion, rather than villainizing the individual and holding a grudge against her. Finally, tell yourself that, as human beings, we have all acted in inappropriate ways and said unkind things; I’m certainly not perfect by any means.

Put Things Into Perspective

Next, ask yourself why you perceive the person as difficult. What makes the individual so hard to deal with? Why did you respond in the way you did? Why did Jane’s remark make you feel angry or hurt, for example? Was it purely because of what Jane said, or has it something to do with you?

I notice that my own response to negative behavior is particularly strong when deeply held opinions and beliefs are challenged. If I think of myself as someone who is decisive and knows what’s right for his product, then I am likely to be more affected by Jane’s remarks—independent of her intentions. Similarly, I find that when I am stressed or tense, any wrongdoing I experience feels worse than when I am relaxed and content.

Finally, look at the data and calmly consider what actually happened. Jane’s remark might have felt like a slap in the face. But did she mean to be nasty? And did you contribute to the conflict in any way? Was there anything unhelpful you might have said or done to Jane, intentionally or unintentionally? This doesn’t excuse Jane’s behavior, of course. But it helps put things into perspective and move on from blaming Jane to resolving the conflict.

Respond Skilfully

When you meet Jane to address the issue, approach the meeting with the intention of understanding and reconciling, not winning. Conflict resolution is not about getting the better of the other person; it’s about developing a shared perspective on what happened, agreeing on the changes required, and rebuilding trust.

Share your perspective and experience in a constructive way, and be kind: Jane may not be (fully) aware of her actions or their impact on you. At the same time, be honest and firm. Use 'I' language; describe what you saw and heard, and how it affected you. For example, “I heard you challenge my ability to prioritize and make effective product decisions; then I saw you leave without giving me time to respond. I consequently felt angry and disappointed.”

Separate the person from the issue. Don’t blame or attack the other person, don’t generalize (“that’s typical of you”), don’t talk about what other people may have said (“John says so too”), don’t speculate (“it’s probably because you didn’t get what you wanted in the previous meeting”). Listen with an open mind and try to suspend judgment. We all hold a piece of truth.

Offer a helping hand and make constructive suggestions for resolving the issue. Suggest changes that you are prepared to make, such as, “from now on, I will invite you to the product road mapping workshops so you can better understand the overall constraints we have to take into account when prioritizing the product backlog,” or “I will listen more carefully to your suggestions so you no longer feel ignored and side-lined.”

State the positive changes that you wish to see. For instance, “it would really help me if you tried to be more patient and understanding,” or “it would be great if you could let me know sooner if you feel your opinion is not heard.”

Remember: while you want to be kind and caring, you are not responsible for the other person’s thoughts and feelings. You can encourage another person to change. But you cannot make someone change their attitude and behavior.

Move On

If everything works out well, you’ve made up with Jane and agreed on a way forward. What’s then left to do is to strengthen the relationship and fully re-establish the trust that might have been lost. This is achieved by working together, as well as socializing, for example, by having coffee or lunch together.

If the conversation didn’t go well, consider what your next steps might be. Should you talk to Jane again? Should you involve someone who can mediate? Should you escalate the issue? Talking to your manager or Scrum Master/Coach might help you choose.

Discover how TDM Is Essential To Achieving Quality At Speed For Agile, DevOps, And Continuous Delivery. Brought to you in partnership with CA Technologies

Topics:
agile ,agile teams ,conflict resolution in the workplace ,devlife

Published at DZone with permission of Roman Pichler, DZone MVB. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

{{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}

{{ parent.tldr }}

{{ parent.urlSource.name }}