{{ !articles[0].partner.isSponsoringArticle ? "Platinum" : "Portal" }} Partner

A Different Style of Fluent Selenium Tests

Kevin Dishman is ThoughWorks’ QA lead for a client I “rolled off” a few days ago. He prefers a different style of Java and Page-Objects for Selenium2 / WebDriver codebases. Thus, he switched the foundational tests I’d written before his arrival to be more like the style he prefers. I’ve paralleled that change in the public Fluent-Selenium examples project: github.com/paul-hammant/fluent-selenium-examples.

A Second Branch

The second branch, for better or for worse, is called “more_typesafe”.

GitHub’s visualization of the different branches at the time of the original commit (August 8th): github.com/paul-hammant/fluent-selenium-examples/compare/d7e55dd1fd41f86…151e589cd86b378e3a6c33

The gist of that is:

There are pros and cons to both, I think.

Published at DZone with permission of {{ articles[0].authors[0].realName }}, DZone MVB. (source)

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

{{ tag }}, {{tag}},

{{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}

{{ parent.tldr }}

{{ parent.urlSource.name }}
{{ parent.authors[0].realName || parent.author}}

{{ parent.authors[0].tagline || parent.tagline }}

{{ parent.views }} ViewsClicks