Disruptor 2.0 - All Change Please
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
Martin recently announced version 2.0 of the Disruptor -
basically there have been so many changes since we first open-sourced
it that it's time to mark that officially. His post goes over all the
changes, the aim of this article is to attempt to translate my previous
blog posts into new-world-speak, since it's going to take a long time to
re-write each of them all over again. Now I see the disadvantage of
In the old world
This is an example of a configuration of the Disruptor (specifically a diamond configuration). If none of this means anything to you, feel free to go back and refresh yourself on all the (now outdated) Disruptor details.
The most obvious changes over the last few weeks have been:
- Updated naming convention
- Integrating the producer barrier into the ring buffer
- Adding the Disruptor wizard into the main code base.
No more tedious wiring
Now the Disruptor wizard is part of the Disruptor itself, my whole post on wiring is pretty pointless - which is good, actually, because it was a little involved.
These days, if you want to create the diamond pattern (for example the FizzBuzz performance test), it's a lot simpler:
DisruptorWizard dw = new DisruptorWizard<FizzBuzzEvent>( ENTRY_FACTORY, RING_BUFFER_SIZE, EXECUTOR, ClaimStrategy.Option.SINGLE_THREADED, WaitStrategy.Option.YIELDING); FizzBuzzEventHandler fizzHandler = new FizzBuzzEventHandler(FIZZ); FizzBuzzEventHandler buzzHandler = new FizzBuzzEventHandler(BUZZ); FizzBuzzEventHandler fizzBuzzHandler = new FizzBuzzEventHandler(FIZZ_BUZZ); dw.handleEventsWith(fizzHandler, buzzHandler) .then(fizzBuzzHandler); RingBuffer ringBuffer = dw.start();
Other changes: performance improvements
As Martin mentions in his post, he's managed to significantly improve the performance (even more!) of the Disruptor in 2.0.
The short version of this is that there is a shiny new class, Sequence, which both takes care of the cache line padding, and removes the need for memory barriers. The cache line padding is now done slightly differently because, bless Java 7's little cotton socks, it managed to "optimise" our old technique away.
I'll leave you to read the details over there, in this post I just wanted to give a quick summary of the changes and explain why my old diagrams may no longer be correct.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.