Eight Fallacies of Declarative Computing
Eight Fallacies of Declarative Computing
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.
Join For FreeHortonworks Sandbox for HDP and HDF is your chance to get started on learning, developing, testing and trying out new features. Each download comes preconfigured with interactive tutorials, sample data and developments from the Apache community.
Erik Meijer listed eight fallacies of declarative programming in his keynote address at YOW in Melbourne this morning:
- Exceptions do not exist.
- Statistics are precise.
- Memory is infinite.
- There are no side-effects.
- Schema doesn’t change.
- There is one developer.
- Compilation time is free.
- The language is homogeneous.
To put these in some context, Erik made several points about declarative programming in his talk. First, “declarative” is relative. For example, if you’re an assembly programmer, C looks declarative, but if you program in some higher level language, C looks procedural. Then he argued that SQL is not as declarative as people say and that in some ways SQL is quite procedural. Finally, the fallacies listed above correspond to things that can cause a declarative abstraction to leak.
(The videos of the YOW presentations should be available in January. I haven’t heard anyone say, but I imagine the slides from the presentations will be available sooner, maybe in a few days.)
Hortonworks Community Connection (HCC) is an online collaboration destination for developers, DevOps, customers and partners to get answers to questions, collaborate on technical articles and share code examples from GitHub. Join the discussion.
Like This Article? Read More From DZone
Published at DZone with permission of John Cook , DZone MVB. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.
{{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}
{{ parent.tldr }}
{{ parent.linkDescription }}
{{ parent.urlSource.name }}