Over a million developers have joined DZone.

Firefox is Slow, Lodash is Fast

DZone's Guide to

Firefox is Slow, Lodash is Fast

A look at some benchmarks for cloning JavaScript objects between five different browsers.

· Web Dev Zone ·
Free Resource

Access over 20 APIs and mobile SDKs, up to 250k transactions free with no credit card required

Look at those colors! Aren’t they shiny?

They’re super shiny (unless you’re color blind), but what do they mean? I’m glad you asked. That’s a speed comparison chart of 6 ways to clone JavaScript objects, run in 5 browsers, on 2 devices: My laptop and my iPhone 5SE.

You can try the benchmark yourself: Click here. I’d make an iframe, but it freezes my browser for many seconds at a time. It even freezes the CSS animation on that React logo.

Dangerous business, those benchmarks.

Firefox is the only browser that decides something weird is going on and throws a warning. Everyone else happily blocks JS, CSS, and UI.

Now, is this benchmark fair? I don’t know. Running benchmarks on a computer that’s doing a bunch of other stuff is never really fair. Maybe a different tab just tried to do something, or Spotify downloaded a song, or Dropbox ran a metadata update on my entire hard drive.

A bunch of things can affect these results. That’s why you can run it yourself. But I did my best to ensure fairness as much as I could.

  • Each test runs alone, asynchronously
  • Each test is re-run 20-times
  • Each test uses the same source data
  • Each test produces the same deep-ish cloned dataset

I say “deep-ish” because we’re cloning an array of some 81,000 objects. The objects are shallow, which means we can cut corners.

const experiments = {
            'lodash _.cloneDeep': _.cloneDeep,
            '.map + lodash _.clone': (arr) => arr.map((d) => _.clone(d)),
            '.map + lodash _.assign': (arr) => arr.map((d) => _.assign({}, d)),
            'JSON string/parse': (arr) => JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(arr)),
            '.map + Object.assign': (arr) => arr.map((d) => Object.assign({}, d)),
            '.map + React\'s update()': (arr) => arr.map((d) => update({}, {$merge: d}))

We use _.cloneDeep without understanding context. This is a little bit unfair because it tries to do too much. We run _.clone_.assign,Object.assign, and React’s update in a loop. They benefit from not trying to work in the general case. JSON.parse/stringify is on the same level as _.cloneDeep: naïve, complete, works for anything.

I’m gobsmacked that for datasets this big, you’re better off converting to JSON and back than using Lodash’s cloneDeep function. I have no idea how that’s even possible. Maybe JSON benefits from an implementation detail deep in the engine?

But then why is _.assign faster than Object.assign? They both make a shallow copy of an object, but Object.assign is a language feature, and _.assign is implemented in pure JavaScript.

I think … how else? I hope @jdalton can shed some light on this.

You can see the entire test runner on Github here. There are a few comments, but the interesting bit is this runner function. It ensure fairness by isolating timing to only the cloning method.

    runner(name, method) {
        let data = this.state.data;

        const times = d3.range(0, this.N).map(() => {
            const t1 = new Date();

            let copy = method(data);

            const t2 = new Date();
            return t2 - t1;

        let results = this.state.results;
        results.push({name: name,
                      avg: d3.mean(times)});

        this.setState({results: results});

The runner itself is called asynchronously via setTimeout(foo, 0), and the async library ensures tests don’t happen in parallel. Insiderunner, we iterate through N = 20 indexes, take timestamp, perform clone, take another timestamp, and construct an array of time diffs. Then we use d3.mean to get the average and add it tothis.state.results with setState.

It runs in React because I’m lazy and create-react-app is the quickest way to set everything up .

Maybe there’s some unfairness in how Babel compiles this code? That’s possible.

My conclusion is this: Use the appropriate algorithm for your use-case, and run your code in Chrome.

#1 for location developers in quality, price and choice, switch to HERE.

firefox ,benchmarks ,javascript ,objects

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

{{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}

{{ parent.tldr }}

{{ parent.urlSource.name }}