“Forget Me” and Tests
“Forget Me” and Tests
Learn about how you can easily provide users with a way to delete their profiles, and how it impacts your testing efforts.
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
The need for DevOps innovation has never been greater. Get the results from over 100 business value assessments in this whitepaper, Digital Darwinism: Driving Digital Transformation, to see the positive impact of DevOps first hand.
Your users have profiles on your web application. And normally you should give them a way to delete their profiles (at least that’s what the European Court has decided).
That “simply” means you need to have a
/forget-me endpoint which deletes every piece of data for the current user. From the database, from the file storage, from the search engine, etc. Apart from giving your users at least partial control over their own data (whether you can have it or not is their decision), it is also a benefit for developers.
Apart from your isolated unit tests, containing a lot of mocks, you have other sorts of tests – integration test, acceptance tests, Selenim tests. All of these need a way to leave the database in the same state that it was before they were executed. In some cases you can use read-only transactions (e.g. with spring-test you get that automatically), or you can use an in-memory database and hope it will work the same way as your production one, or you can drop the database and recreate it on each run. But these are partial solutions with some additional complexity.
The best way, I think, is to just reuse the “forget me” functionality. From your acceptance/selenium tests you can call the /forget-me endpoint at the end of the test (tearDown), and for your integration tests y. If you distribute client-side APIs (or a third-party is building them against a test deployments of your system), you can again call the forget-me endpoint.
That, of course, doesn’t cover non-user-related data that you need in the database. If you have such data (apart from enumarations and data that should be always there), you have to take care of it separately.
Doesn’t that bring some additional complexity as well, and the constant need to update your forget-me functionality? Isn’t having read-only transactions, or a shell script that recreates the database after each run, simpler to support? Assuming that you need to have a properly working forget-me functionality anyway – no. It’s better to reuse it. That would also make sure the endpoint is indeed working properly, and your users can be fully forgotten.
Published at DZone with permission of Bozhidar Bozhanov , DZone MVB. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.