The Google Web Toolkit (GWT) has become one of the most important Java
technologies, as it gives it a credible web platform strategy. I used
to be doubtful of the extra compilation step and developed with DWR and Dojo, but have since become a convert.
- A single code base for client and server.
- Very quick turn-around: after making changes, the server and client can be reloaded quickly to reflect the changes (only the first start of the client is a bit slow, subsequent reloads are fast).
- Development tools easy to install: All you need is two Eclipse plugins and you are done.
- IDE support: The Eclipse plugin helps with various coding tasks and errors (such as keeping Service and AsyncService consistent)
- Web application easy to install: GWT produces a WAR file. Drop it into a servlet container such as Jetty or Tomcat. Done.
- Fast and reliable GUI layout: Still limited compared to what Swing and SWT offer, but for the first time acceptable.
- gwt-dnd: Implements Drag and Drop in pure GWT.
- GWT Mosaic: Also extends GWT, but as pure GWT and with less widgets/features.
- Currently, the GWT incubator hosts experimental features. Long-term, its parts will be migrated to either separate projects or the GWT core.
- A post reveals interesting things about GWT’s future. For example, it will get data-backed widgets.
- More widgets: The current widgets are limited (menus don’t ensure that they are visible, no support for shortcuts, no resizable dialogs, no context menus, etc.) and there are not enough of them. I expect this area to improve quickly, though, now that all the important foundations have been laid (event handlers, modular CSS, layout panels).
- Switching back-ends: Many computers are only intermittently online. Programming an offline mode for a GWT application is difficult, because the server usually hosts important functionality. A hypothetical way of solving this is by installing a back-end locally. The client could switch between this back-end and the server. Managing installed back-ends should work similar to Java Web Start. A local back-end could also provide a GWT application with desktop features, because it has access to desktop resources such as the file system.
- Better client-side modularity: I love Eclipse’s modularity, especially when working in a team. You can have a core plugin that is extended via other plugins residing in separate projects. It would be nice if one could extend a GWT application in a similar fashion. On the server side that is possible via OSGi. On the client side, that is currently not possible.
- Sending binary data from server to browser: For example, one cannot create images on the server and send them to the client via RPC. Data URIs are a work-around, but a poor one.
- Annotations for hiding code from the client: If an object is transferred back and forth between client and server, there are often some server-only methods. An annotation would allow one to hide those methods. There is an issue for this feature. You can star it, if you would like to see it fixed.
- Instantiating classes via class literals: There is no Class.newInstance() in client-side GWT. One has to resort to sending a factory to the client.
- Two two useful methods: Class#getSimpleName(), String.format() are simple to implement, so I don’t see the reason for not doing so in client-side GWT.