DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports Events Over 2 million developers have joined DZone. Join Today! Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile Manage Email Subscriptions Moderation Admin Console How to Post to DZone Article Submission Guidelines
View Profile
Sign Out
Refcards
Trend Reports
Events
Zones
Culture and Methodologies Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks
Culture and Methodologies
Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering
AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture
Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding
Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance
Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks
  1. DZone
  2. Culture and Methodologies
  3. Career Development
  4. How you can collaborate with your enemies

How you can collaborate with your enemies

Adi Gaskell user avatar by
Adi Gaskell
·
Feb. 22, 15 · Interview
Like (0)
Save
Tweet
Share
1.44K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

You would imagine that in a world of collaboration and cooperation being friends with those around you would be a good thing to be.  Indeed, a study last year by Globoforce found that a workforce that has strong bonds is likely to be a much happier and more engaged one.

Of course, that isn’t always possible, and it’s likely that there will be some people at work that you don’t get on with at all well.  How is the best way to deal with them?

The old adage suggests that you should keep your friends close, but your enemies closer, but a recent study suggests that may not be the best approach at all, at least that is if you want to collaborate effectively with them.

The researchers used the renowned bear pit of the US Senate as their petri dish.  They analyzed the behaviors of senators over a 36 year period from 1973 to 2009 to see how they engaged with their ideological rivals.

They found a fascinating pattern begin to emerge.  There seemed to be a direct link between the amount of contact rival senators had with one another and the closeness of their voting record.  This was found to be particularly pronounced on issues that were very divisive.

“Conventional wisdom says interpersonal contact between people will foster collaboration and consensus,” the authors say. “We found that increasing physical contact between people who have opposing and public political identities can instead promote divergence of attitudes or behavior. This tendency is further amplified in environments involving high conflict, which makes political identities more salient.”

So in other words, the more people with different opinions mingled with each other, the more divergent their actions became.  A bit like trying to mix oil with water.

The researchers used two distinct measures of a senators political identity:

  1. their party affiliation
  2. the religious climate in their home state

The engagement between senators also utilized two metrics:

  1. whether they were sat close to one another in the Senate
  2. whether they were on the same committees

It emerged that when senators from the same party had more contact, their voting behavior tended to converge.  When senators from different parties had more contact however, usually via committee, their voting behavior tended to get further apart.

“Co-location can induce both positive and negative outcomes. Sometimes keeping some distance is the better option,” the paper says.

Whilst the study was limited to the political arena, the authors believe that the findings are just as relevant for other fields of organizational life.  Indeed, they think it is appropriate for any environment where opinions can be polarized.

For example, the authors explain, “Post-merger integration, particularly following a contested takeover, can produce oppositional identities in a very public setting. In such cases, it may help to move interactions into more private settings and find common ground on less divisive issues before tackling the more controversial ones.”

So there may actually be good reason to keep your enemies far away after all.

Original post 

Contacts (Apple) career Interaction Arena (web browser) IT Papers (software) Measure (physics) POST (HTTP) Metric (unit)

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Popular on DZone

  • Microservices Discovery With Eureka
  • An Introduction to Data Mesh
  • API Design Patterns Review
  • Quick Pattern-Matching Queries in PostgreSQL and YugabyteDB

Comments

Partner Resources

X

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Send feedback
  • Careers
  • Sitemap

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 600 Park Offices Drive
  • Suite 300
  • Durham, NC 27709
  • support@dzone.com
  • +1 (919) 678-0300

Let's be friends: