I Wish C# Didn't Throw When Iterating Over Null Collections
I Wish C# Didn't Throw When Iterating Over Null Collections
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.
Join For FreeConsider the following code:
List<string> list = null; foreach (var element in list) //... NullReferenceException above
Boom, in your face! We want to go through all elements in the nonexisting collection. Not empty, but nonexisting. While you may argue that semantically there is some difference, when do you actually want that exception to blow up? Fix is easy, but ugly:
if (list != null) { foreach (var element in list) // }
One way to implement this would be to allow a compiler flag that will expand foreach (var element in list)
into:
if (list != null) foreach (var element in list)
This is the same question as before: should you ever return null collections.
My answer is no, forget the null and make code prettier
Published at DZone with permission of Toni Petrina , DZone MVB. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.
{{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}
{{ parent.tldr }}
{{ parent.linkDescription }}
{{ parent.urlSource.name }}