IBM Lets Go of Lotus
IBM Lets Go of Lotus
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
Find out how Database DevOps helps your team deliver value quicker while keeping your data safe and your organization compliant. Align DevOps for your applications with DevOps for your SQL Server databases to discover the advantages of true Database DevOps, brought to you in partnership with Redgate
"IBM has dropped the Lotus brand from its collaboration software products as it prepares to release a new version of Notes and Domino.In a move that has been a long time in the making, IBM is dropping the Lotus brand and moving forward with the IBM brand, only to identify products like Notes and Domino.
IBM plans to deliver a public beta of IBM Notes/Domino 9.0 Social Edition that will not carry the Lotus brand, Ed Brill, director of social business and collaboration solutions at IBM, wrote in a Nov. 13 blog post. "…This beta is also the point where Notes/Domino will join other IBM software solutions in sporting only the IBM brand—the second-most-valuable brand in the world," Brill said in his post.
IBM's dropping the Lotus brand might be viewed as a historic moment for old-timers, but also as a business-as-usual move by an industry giant. Lotus has been around since 1982, initially as the Massachusetts-based Lotus Development Corp., which released its famed Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet in 1983. IBM acquired Lotus in 1995 for $3.5 billion, primarily to get hold of Lotus Notes, then a wildly popular groupware system developed by Ray Ozzie's Iris Associates that was eating into IBM's profits.
Goodbye and goodnight "Lotus"... [Insert 'Feeling old statement here'] [Insert 'Wonder how many people today even remember the Lotus name' statement here] [Insert 'I wonder how many people still have Lotus 123 installed' question here (No, I don't, but I think I've got the bits somewhere... ;)]
Published at DZone with permission of Greg Duncan , DZone MVB. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.