I ran into the following question: implement a class that takes as an argument (in the constructor) Iterator<Iterator<E>> and returns an iterator that can iterate all the elements under the iterator of iterators in a round-robin manner, meaning, according to the order of the numbers in the following screenshot:

I searched online and found implementations such as this, this, and even Guava, but they are not helpful in our case since the order they are iterating is vertical: 1,7,13,17,2,8,14,18,3,9,4,…

So I decided to come up with my solution to the problem, and here’s what I got:

import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.NoSuchElementException;

/**
 * Created by alfasin on 11/15/15.
 */


public class MultiIterator<E> implements Iterator {

    List<Iterator<E>> iterators = new LinkedList<>();
    Iterator<E> current = null;

    public MultiIterator(Iterator<Iterator<E>> iterator) {
        // copy the iterators into a list
        while (iterator.hasNext()) {
            iterators.add(iterator.next());
        }
    }

    @Override
    public boolean hasNext() {
        boolean result = false;
        if (iterators.isEmpty() && (current == null || !current.hasNext())) {
            return false;
        }

        if (current == null) {
            current = iterators.remove(0);
        }

        while (!current.hasNext() && !iterators.isEmpty()) {
            current = iterators.remove(0);
        }

        if (current.hasNext()) {
            result = true;
        }
        return result;
    }

    @Override
    public E next() {
        if (current == null) {
            try {
                current = iterators.remove(0);
            } catch (IndexOutOfBoundsException e) {
                throw new NoSuchElementException();
            }
        }
        E result = current.next(); // if this method was called without checking 'hasNext' this line might raise NoSuchElementException which is fine
        iterators.add(current);
        current = iterators.remove(0);
        return result;
    }

    // test
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        List<Integer> a = new LinkedList<>();
        a.add(1);
        a.add(7);
        a.add(13);
        a.add(17);
        List<Integer> b = new LinkedList<>();
        b.add(2);
        b.add(8);
        b.add(14);
        b.add(18);
        List<Integer> c = new LinkedList<>();
        c.add(3);
        c.add(9);
        List<Integer> d = new LinkedList<>();
        d.add(4);
        d.add(10);
        d.add(15);
        List<Integer> e = new LinkedList<>();
        e.add(5);
        e.add(11);
        List<Integer> f = new LinkedList<>();
        f.add(6);
        f.add(12);
        f.add(16);
        f.add(19);
        List<Iterator<Integer>> iterators = new LinkedList<>();
        iterators.add(a.iterator());
        iterators.add(b.iterator());
        iterators.add(c.iterator());
        iterators.add(d.iterator());
        iterators.add(e.iterator());
        iterators.add(f.iterator());
        MultiIterator<Integer> it = new MultiIterator<>(iterators.iterator());
        while (it.hasNext()) {
            System.out.print(it.next() + ","); // prints: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,
        }
    }
}

It worked great, but I wanted to find a different approach. And then it came…I can, during initialization, read all the elements into one list and then return an iterator of that list!

Let’s see how it works:

import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.List;

/**
 * Created by alfasin on 11/15/15.
 */

public class MultiIterator<E> {

    Iterator<Iterator<E>> iterator = null;
    List<E> elements = new LinkedList<>();

    private MultiIterator(Iterator<Iterator<E>> iterator) {
        this.iterator = iterator;
    }

    private void copyElementsInOrder() {
        List<Iterator<E>> iterators = new LinkedList<>();
        // copy the iterators into a list
        while (iterator.hasNext()) {
            iterators.add(iterator.next());
        }
        // go over the list, round-robin, and grab one
        // element from each sub-iterator and add it to *elements*
        // empty sub-iterators will get dropped off the list
        while (!iterators.isEmpty()) {
            Iterator<E> subIterator = iterators.remove(0);
            if (subIterator.hasNext()) {
                elements.add(subIterator.next());
                iterators.add(subIterator);
            }
        }
    }

    public static <E> Iterator<E> iterator(Iterator<Iterator<E>> iterator) {
        MultiIterator<E> instance = new MultiIterator<>(iterator);
        instance.copyElementsInOrder();
        return instance.elements.iterator();
    }

    // test
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        List<Integer> a = new LinkedList<>();
        a.add(1);
        a.add(7);
        a.add(13);
        a.add(17);
        List<Integer> b = new LinkedList<>();
        b.add(2);
        b.add(8);
        b.add(14);
        b.add(18);
        List<Integer> c = new LinkedList<>();
        c.add(3);
        c.add(9);
        List<Integer> d = new LinkedList<>();
        d.add(4);
        d.add(10);
        d.add(15);
        List<Integer> e = new LinkedList<>();
        e.add(5);
        e.add(11);
        List<Integer> f = new LinkedList<>();
        f.add(6);
        f.add(12);
        f.add(16);
        f.add(19);
        List<Iterator<Integer>> iterators = new LinkedList<>();
        iterators.add(a.iterator());
        iterators.add(b.iterator());
        iterators.add(c.iterator());
        iterators.add(d.iterator());
        iterators.add(e.iterator());
        iterators.add(f.iterator());
        Iterator<Integer> it = MultiIterator.<Integer>iterator(iterators.iterator());
        while (it.hasNext()) {
            System.out.print(it.next() + ","); // prints: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,
        }
    }
}

There are pros and cons to each one of these approaches:

The first approach is more complex because it requires checking and handling of many edge-cases (including catching an IndexOutOfBoundsException in case that our list of iterators is empty and throwing the proper NoSuchElementException instead).

The second approach is more concise on one hand, but on the other hand it requires copying, in-advance, all the elements (greedy) vs. the first approach which is lazy and should be preferred in cases of large datasets.

Note that the second approach implements a factory and as such it doesn’t implement theIterator interface!