Next.js has been growing rather quickly despite being new to the scene due to its convenience and ease of use. So, What makes Next.js different, and is it here to stay?
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
What Makes Next.js Different?
- MVP (Minimum Viable Product)
- Jamstack websites
- Web Portals
- Single web pages
- Static websites
- SaaS products
- eCommerce and retail websites
- Complex and demanding web applications
- Interactive user interfaces
Their versatility ensures their success because developers can achieve what clients want for their consumers. Some of these options include:
User experience freedom - You have the freedom to customize the frontend or design of what consumers see without having to limit yourself to plugins, templates, or any eCommerce and CMS platforms when using Next.js
Adaptability and responsiveness – As mentioned earlier, all pages developed with Next.js ensures that it is automatically compatible with all devices, whether mobile, pc, tablet, etc, despite being static
Superfast load time – Websites created with Next.js load extremely quickly because they are inherently responsive despite being static pages, this also ensures that it is SEO-friendly as Google can scan webpages generated by Next.js much faster than average
Data security – Another plus when using static pages is that your website is secured from database vulnerabilities as there’s no direct connection to any database.
There is no reason that Next.js isn’t here to stay due to our current culture and trends pushing us towards developing faster and more effective frameworks so that our websites can load in milliseconds. Next.js allows developers to create super fast and ultra user-friendly websites, which is exactly what everyone is searching for.
Are There Any Cons To Using Next.js?
Like most things in existence, there are always some downsides to a particular product and Next.js isn’t free from its own flaws, although there are updates that should add to its overall performance.
Next.js is considerably more pricey than other frameworks and it doesn’t offer free management. You will need someone who is knowledgeable with Next to make any changes. There are also ongoing costs that you have to consider, such as hiring a web developer to create frontend pages whenever the need arises. Next.js also doesn’t offer a built-in state manager and has a distinct lack of plugins, which means you will have to find a third-party plugin that is compatible with Next.js.
Users have also complained that the static rendering made their code more complex and that they didn’t have any real use for static rendering, which is the biggest selling point for Next.js. Having custom extensions increases the risk of bugs and edge cases which wasn’t ideal, and pretty much removes the best features of Next.js.
Next.js isn’t the only framework out there that’s being employed so rampantly. React.js can be considered a predecessor but it acts more like a library than a framework, and Next.js can be used with it for an enhanced experience.
Angular.js also provides a rich library of web page applications. Furthermore, being backed by Google means that you can expect timely updates and advantages towards SEO.
Our world is becoming increasingly technology-driven and it’s all moving online. While holograms and other real-world objects are important, the digital world which we are unable to touch is what the world is currently focused on.
Regardless of what framework you decide to go with, remember that you shouldn’t be afraid of change. Just like the constant evolution of technology, we should also be constant in our quest for improvement.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.