Java and Node in Microcontainers with Docker
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
Java and Node in Microcontainers on Docker
In the first article I presented a way to create Microcontainers which use volume containers to share runtimes and executables so that the actual application containers can be kept small. The containers are based on BusyBox (progrium/busybox) and necessary libraries are symbolically linked so that the executables work in the very light environment.
In this article I take the concept forward with a Java runtime environment and service registration and discovery using Consul.
The concept is built on Docker's ability to use multiple volume containers per application container. This allows the container to have a mix of different executables available and provide a specialized, minimal runtime for a specific application like Jetty.
I present an example which runs Consul for service registration and discovery in all containers, a Node.js-based hello world application, a Java-based hello world application on Jetty and cAdvisor for container monitoring. The set-up can be run with Weave-based networking with static internal IP addresses or without it.
The concept is built in three parts:
- Fileboxes containing the executables and runtime environments. The source code can be found from github at https://github.com/SirIle/fileboxes.
- Microboxes setting up the application containers with everything linked into place. The source code can be found from https://github.com/SirIle/microboxes.
- Microtestboxes containing the actual applications for the demo and runit configuration extending the microboxes. The source code is available at https://github.com/SirIle/microtestboxes.
This image shows how the application containers are built by extending containers. It also shows which fileboxes are needed for the application containers to work and which ports are exposed.
Corresponding docker.io trusted builds have been made so trying out the examples doesn't require local building. The filebox volume containers need to be created locally.
Fileboxes are special containers that only define volumes. They are based on tianon/true image which only contains an assembler version of true command and causes minimum overhead (125 bytes) on the file container.
Basefilebox contains the components that are provided to all containers. For this demo that means Consul for service registration and discovery between containers and runit to allow Consul and the actual application to run at the same time in the container. The buildfile copies the executables from the image to the correct location in the volume.
As Consul is statically linked it is extremely easy to get it to run. Main idea is to have a Consul agent running in all containers so that service discovery is trivial. As all the containers get an own IP either from the Docker itself or from an external network configuration mechanism like Weave, services can be left running in the default ports and use DNS A-records for service discovery. This simplifies things as there is no need to query for ports or extra information, which could be done using SRV records or a REST-based API.
A shell script is used to start the Consul which checks if an environment variable called DC is defined. If it is, the script waits for the Weave interface to become available before getting the IP of that interface and announcing that with Consul. If it isn't, the IP of the container is received from the /etc/hosts file.
Runit is used to control multiple processes running in the microcontainer. It is used instead of supervisord as it is very small and doesn't require any extra libraries to be available. It consists of two commands: runsv and runsvdir.
Dockerfile for the base container
FROM tianon/true MAINTAINER Ilkka Anttonen version: 0.1 VOLUME /opt/files COPY consul /opt/files/consul COPY runsv /opt/files/runsv COPY runsvdir /opt/files/runsvdir
Oracle JRE 8
The Java runtime is quite large. I looked around for stripped versions, but most either weren't very compatible or were quite old. In the end I figured that sharing the runtime-executables via a volume container could be a good trade-off between compatibility and size. This way the volume container is built once and then all the containers that need the Java runtime on that host can just include it. Without any extra modifications, the size of the image is 168.5 MB. Building the volume container is extremely quick, but downloading the image will take some time.
Dockerfile for the Java 8 container
FROM tianon/true MAINTAINER Ilkka Anttonen version: 0.1 VOLUME /opt/files/java COPY jre1.8.0_25 /opt/files/java/jre
Node executable that was built on the Ubuntu host only requires the libstdc++ library to run. This nodefilebox includes the executable and the library. I thought about including npm as well, but decided against it as the container is meant to be a runtime instead of a development environment. This way the application with all the dependencies can be built on host (or later on a build-container) and the resulting files can just be copied to the application container.
Dockerfile for the Nodejs volume container
FROM tianon/true MAINTAINER Ilkka Anttonen version: 0.1 VOLUME /opt/files/node COPY libstdc++.so.6 /opt/files/node/libstdc++.so.6 COPY node /opt/files/node/node
This filebox contains the unpacked Jetty 9 distributable. To be usable, the container running this must also use the Javafilebox to provide the JRE.
Dockerfile for the Jettyfilebox
FROM tianon/true MAINTAINER Ilkka Anttonen version: 0.1 VOLUME /opt/files/jetty COPY jetty-distribution-9.2.4.v20141103 /opt/files/jetty/jetty
Building the volume containers from the images
The volume containers can be built with the following four commands:
docker run --name=basefilebox sirile/basefilebox docker run --name=nodejsfilebox sirile/nodejsfilebox docker run --name=java8filebox sirile/java8filebox docker run --name=jettyfilebox sirile/jettyfilebox
This also downloads the container images to the local registry. The JRE image is rather large, others are small.
These are containers that stack on top of each other to build the runtime environments. They link the executables and libraries that the filebox volume containers provide to the file system. Some of them can be started by themselves instead of extending with applications for development and testing purposes. More information about this can be found from corresponding README.md files in Github.
A base Microcontainer built on top of progrium/busybox. Not that useful by itself, but acts as a base for running other applications. Includes symbolic links for Consul and runit executables. It also includes basic configuration for runit, basic consul configuration including DNS server port specification for the normal port 53 so that it can be used as the local DNS server. The container fires up runit which starts the execution of consul and also other runit controlled processes that can be configured under /etc/service.
Everything built on top of Basebox requires basefilebox volume container for the executables.
Dockerfile for Basebox
FROM progrium/busybox MAINTAINER Ilkka Anttonen version: 0.1 RUN ln -s /opt/files/runsv /sbin/runsv RUN ln -s /opt/files/runsvdir /sbin/runsvdir RUN ln -s /opt/files/consul /usr/bin/consul COPY consul /etc/service/consul/run COPY config-consul.json /etc/consul.d/config-consul.json CMD "/sbin/runsvdir" "/etc/service"
A Microcontainer running on top of sirile/basebox which offers a consul server and consul UI. It also contains a start script for the Consul server which can adapt to Weave provided networking if the environment variable DC has been set. Otherwise it uses the normal IP of the container.
Dockerfile for Consulbox
FROM progrium/busybox MAINTAINER Ilkka Anttonen version: 0.1 COPY consul_ui /opt/consul_ui COPY startConsul.sh /usr/bin/startConsul.sh RUN ln -s /opt/files/consul /usr/bin/consul CMD '/usr/bin/startConsul.sh'
A Microcontainer for a Java based application. The version of the JRE is decided by the volume container that has the files.
Dockerfile for Javabox
FROM sirile/basebox MAINTAINER Ilkka Anttonen version: 0.1 RUN ln -s /opt/files/java/jre/bin/java /usr/bin/java
Jettybox build file does nothing at the moment as there is no need to link Jetty executables to the file system because Jetty can be started directly with a Java -jar command. The container is still created and the actual application container is built on top of it.
A Microcontainer that can be used to run nodejs applications.
Dockerfile for Nodejsbox
FROM sirile/basebox MAINTAINER Ilkka Anttonen version: 0.1 RUN ln -s /opt/files/node/node /usr/bin/node RUN ln -s /opt/files/node/libstdc++.so.6 /lib/libstdc++.so.6
The Jetty example container contains just the example application and configuration plus the runit configuration to start Jetty. The container registers itself to Consul and tells that it provides a jettyhello-service. As the container is based on basebox, it automatically launches the runit defined in that Dockerfile.
Example war-file was downloaded from https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/appdev/sample/. It contains a servlet and a jsp that can be used to demonstrate that the Jetty environment is fully functional.
Dockerfile for Jettytestbox
FROM sirile/jettybox< MAINTAINER Ilkka Anttonen version: 0.1 COPY jetty /etc/service/jetty/run COPY start.ini start.ini COPY sample.war webapps/sample.war COPY hello.json /etc/consul.d/hello.json
A very simple nodejs and express based hello world application. The container registers itself to Consul and tells that it provides a nodehello-service.
Dockerfile for Nodejstestbox
FROM sirile/nodejsbox MAINTAINER Ilkka Anttonen version: 0.1 COPY express.js express.js COPY node_modules node_modules COPY node /etc/service/node/run COPY hello.json /etc/consul.d/hello.json
Running the example application
The github project https://github.com/SirIle/microtestboxes contains shell scripts which can be used to start the applications. As docker.io trusted builds have been defined, local building is not necessary.
Running with Weave provided networking
This can be started with the startTestboxes.sh script, which does the following:
sudo weave launch sudo weave run 10.0.1.1/22 -p 8500:8500 -h consul -e DC=west --name consul --volumes-from basefilebox sirile/consulbox sudo weave run 10.0.1.2/22 --volumes-from basefilebox --volumes-from nodejsfilebox -e DC=west --link consul:consul -h nodebox --name nodebox --dns 127.0.0.1 -p 80:80 sirile/nodejstestbox sudo weave run 10.0.1.3/22 --volumes-from basefilebox --volumes-from java8filebox --volumes-from jettyfilebox -e DC=west --link consul:consul -h jettybox --name jettybox --dns 127.0.0.1 -p 81:80 sirile/jettytestbox sudo weave run 10.0.1.4/22 --volume=/:/rootfs:ro --volume=/var/run:/var/run:rw --volume=/sys:/sys:ro --volume=/var/lib/docker/:/var/lib/docker:ro --publish=8080:8080 --name=cadvisor google/cadvisor:latest
Running without Weave
Running the example without Weave networking can be done with the startTestboxesNoWeave.sh script which does:
docker run -p 8500:8500 -h consul -d --name consul --volumes-from basefilebox sirile/consulbox docker run --volumes-from basefilebox -d --volumes-from nodejsfilebox --link consul:consul -h nodebox --name nodebox --dns 127.0.0.1 -p 80:80 sirile/nodejstestbox docker run --volumes-from basefilebox -d --volumes-from java8filebox --volumes-from jettyfilebox --link consul:consul -h jettybox --name jettybox --dns 127.0.0.1 -p 81:80 sirile/jettytestbox docker run --volume=/:/rootfs:ro --volume=/var/run:/var/run:rw --volume=/sys:/sys:ro --volume=/var/lib/docker/:/var/lib/docker:ro --publish=8080:8080 --detach=true --name=cadvisor google/cadvisor:latest
Testing the application using a browser
There are several applications available:
- Consul UI can be accessed at port 8500 (for example http://10.10.10.30:8500)
- Nodejs based test application runs at port 80 (http://10.10.10.30)
- Jetty based test application runs at port 81 at context /sample (http://10.10.10.30:81/sample)
- cAdvisor runs in port 8080 (http://10.10.10.30:8080)
Testing Consul based connectivity
Consul provided DNS can be used to connect to for example a back-end database that has registered itself as a service. For now there are three services registered: consul, nodehello and jettyhello. Calling between containers can be demonstrated with:
$ docker exec jettybox ping nodehello.service.consul PING nodehello.service.consul (10.0.1.2): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.0.1.2: seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.053 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.1.2: seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.207 ms
This shows that the Consul provided DNS resolves the address nodehello.service.consul to the Weave given internal IP address of nodebox container. Using Weave the container could well be running on a separate host, even on another service provider.
This is the list of the container images:
REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED VIRTUAL SIZE sirile/jettytestbox latest b949a448fdac 5 hours ago 4.815 MB sirile/nodejstestbox latest 3e546fa4663d 5 hours ago 5.775 MB sirile/consulbox latest 38b40fd0b0a8 6 hours ago 5.782 MB sirile/nodejsfilebox latest 34b1ad35b57f 6 hours ago 9.819 MB sirile/java8filebox latest d6b4cb7c3079 9 hours ago 168.5 MB sirile/basefilebox latest f3a56a6cb60e 9 hours ago 15.78 MB sirile/jettyfilebox latest f1a14fe1f665 9 hours ago 14.7 MB google/cadvisor 0.6.1 5c12ab6c98aa 2 days ago 17.55 MB google/cadvisor latest 5c12ab6c98aa 2 days ago 17.55 MB tianon/true latest d222574ccc4a 2 days ago 125 B zettio/weave git-3cb6f1b3cc4b 6e720cb2ccd9 3 days ago 10.83 MB zettio/weave latest 6e720cb2ccd9 3 days ago 10.83 MB
As can be observed, the application containers are very small, around 5 MB. The memory usage varies from about 25MB of the nodejs container to around 100 MB for the untuned Jetty container. Running services as Microservices with the runtime bundled with the service is a feasible thing to do, especially if the runtimes are shared with volume containers which helps to keep the application containers small. This leads to extremely fast build and startup times for the application containers.
The goal of this exercise was to prove that stand alone Microservices are doable on Microcontainers with Docker. They are. They can provide a lot of flexibility in creating the runtime distributed environment especially when service registration and discovery is used along with advanced networking so that the services can reside on multiple nodes.
Next step could be to implement a real multi-tiered application on this base instead of just simple example applications. Suggestions are welcome.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.