DZone
Big Data Zone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
  • Refcardz
  • Trend Reports
  • Webinars
  • Zones
  • |
    • Agile
    • AI
    • Big Data
    • Cloud
    • Database
    • DevOps
    • Integration
    • IoT
    • Java
    • Microservices
    • Open Source
    • Performance
    • Security
    • Web Dev
DZone > Big Data Zone > Julia: A High-Performance Programming Language for Data Science and More

Julia: A High-Performance Programming Language for Data Science and More

Alec Noller user avatar by
Alec Noller
·
Jan. 24, 14 · Big Data Zone · Interview
Like (0)
Save
Tweet
11.68K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

Data scientists working with R and Python, as well as anybody looking for interesting, new-ish, high-performance programming languages should look into the not-as-much-discussed Julia. Evan Miller has written an informative (and pretty persuasive) blog post on his website about the merits of Julia as a solution for programmers who tend to, for example, work in a three-phase pattern in which Python (or R, or Ruby) code is improved upon with something faster, like C++, and then even faster, like assembly code. Julia offers a cleaner approach, Miller says:

Julia breaks down the second wall — the wall between your high-level code and native assembly. Not only can you write code with the performance of C in Julia, you can take a peek behind the curtain of any function into its LLVM Intermediate Representation as well as its generated assembly code — all within the REPL.

That sounds pretty good, right? In other words, Julia is all about getting stuff done quickly and efficiently:

So forget the stuff you may have read about Julia's type system, multiple dispatch and homoiconi-whatever. That stuff is cool (I guess), but if you're like me, the real benefit is being able to go from the first prototype all the way to balls-to-the-wall multi-core SIMD performance optimizations without ever leaving the Julia environment.

Miller's post isn't a tutorial or a getting-started piece, but it does point to a few resources and makes a strong argument in favor of Julia, including some of the drawbacks, such as the lack of libraries, given the recent development of the language. Check out the Miller's full post to learn more.


Data science Julia (programming language)

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Popular on DZone

  • Internal Developer Platform in Plain English
  • Classification of Neural Networks in TensorFlow
  • Kotlin vs Java: Which One Is the Best?
  • How BDD Works Well With EDA

Comments

Big Data Partner Resources

X

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Send feedback
  • Careers
  • Sitemap

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • MVB Program
  • Become a Contributor
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 600 Park Offices Drive
  • Suite 300
  • Durham, NC 27709
  • support@dzone.com
  • +1 (919) 678-0300

Let's be friends:

DZone.com is powered by 

AnswerHub logo