DZone
Java Zone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
  • Refcardz
  • Trend Reports
  • Webinars
  • Zones
  • |
    • Agile
    • AI
    • Big Data
    • Cloud
    • Database
    • DevOps
    • Integration
    • IoT
    • Java
    • Microservices
    • Open Source
    • Performance
    • Security
    • Web Dev
DZone > Java Zone > The Kiwis Reject Software Patents

The Kiwis Reject Software Patents

Mitch Pronschinske user avatar by
Mitch Pronschinske
·
Jul. 15, 10 · Java Zone · Interview
Like (0)
Save
Tweet
12.51K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free
In New Zealand, a major battle is almost won for those who want to see an end to software patenting.  Today the NZ Commerce Minister Simon Power announced that the Patents Bill in Parliament would not be modified despite lobbying efforts from the pro-patent opposition.  This bill, if it passes, will make software unpatentable in New Zealand.

Paul Matthews of the New Zealand Computer Society seems convinced that the NZ Parliament will pass the Patents Bill into law, which would add NZ to a short list of countries that completely reject software patents.  Matthews believes that software patents represent a great risk to the innovation from smaller NZ-based software companies.  The emergence of patent trolls, particularly in the US, has had a chilling effect on worldwide programming innovation.

Two NZ-based software producing companies, Orion Healthcare and Jade Corporation, came to the defense of the Patent Bill when Simon Power's support was wavering.  Together these two companies represent about 50% of New Zealand's software exports, according to Matthews.  Jade Corporation explained why they had stopped applying for software patents years ago and Orion's Ian McCrae added: "We are a software company. Our best protection is to innovate and innovate fast."

In the US, Matthews believes there is also some progress to be seen.  The recent Supreme Court decision on the Bilski case confirmed the unpatentability of abstract ideas, which may set a precedent for extinguishing pure software patents.  Already a huge backlog of software patent applications have been rejected as a direct result of Bilski.

New Zealand's Patents Bill will not block the patenting of non-abstract inventions with a software component, so the minister has instructed the Intellectual Property Office to develop guidelines for these particular patents.  There's still work to be done by anti-software patent parties because without strong guidelines, a potential loophole may develop that allows stealth software patents.  

Matthews said, "We believe this is a win for innovative New Zealand software companies who will now have a reduced, albeit still present, risk when creating innovative software."
Software

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Popular on DZone

  • How the TypeScript ReturnType Works
  • Cypress: The Future of Test Automation! Advantages and Disadvantages
  • Servlets Listeners Introduction and Examples
  • Selenium vs. Protractor: What's the Difference?

Comments

Java Partner Resources

X

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Send feedback
  • Careers
  • Sitemap

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • MVB Program
  • Become a Contributor
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 600 Park Offices Drive
  • Suite 300
  • Durham, NC 27709
  • support@dzone.com
  • +1 (919) 678-0300

Let's be friends:

DZone.com is powered by 

AnswerHub logo