About a decade ago, I discovered the concept of Literate Programming. It's seductive. The idea is to write elegant documentation that embeds the actual working code.
For tricky, complex, high-visibility components, a literate programming approach can give people confidence that the software actually works as advertised.
I actually wrote my own Literate Programming tool. Amazingly, someone actually cared deeply enough to send me a patch to fix some long-standing errors in the LaTeX output. What do I do with a patch kit?
Forward and Reverse LP
There are two schools of literate programming: Forward and Reverse. Forward literate programming starts with a source text and generates the documentation plus the source code files required by the compilers or interpreters.
Reverse literate programming generates documentation from the source files. Tools like
do this very nicely. With a little bit of work, one can create a documentation tree with uses Sphinx's
extension to create great documentation from the source.
Reverse LP, however, tends to focus on the API's of the code
as written. Sometimes it's hard to figure out why it's written that way without further, deeper explanation. And keeping a separate documentation tree in Sphinx means that the code and the documentation can disagree.
My pyWeb Tool
The gold standard in Literate Programming is Knuth's Web. This is available as
which generates TeX output. It's quite sophisticated, allowing very rich markup and formatting of the code.
There are numerous imitators, each less and less sophisticated. When you get to
, you're getting down to the bare bones of what the core use cases are.
For reasons I can't recall, I wrote one, too. I wrote (and used) pyWeb for a few small projects. I posted some code as an experiment on the Zope site, since I was a Zope user for a while. I went to move it and got emails from a couple of folks who are serious Literate Programmers and where concerned when their links broke. Cool.
I moved the code to my own personal site, where it sat between 2002 and today. It was hard-to-find; but there are some hard-core Literate Programmers who are willing to chase down tools and play with them to see how they work at producing elegant, readable code. Way cool.
Recently, I received a patch kit for pyWeb. This says several things.
- It's at least good enough that folks can use it and find the errors in the LaTeX markup it produced
- Some folks care enough about good software to help correct the errors.
- Hosting it on my personal web site is a bad idea.
I expect the number of downloads to hover right around zero forever. But at least it's now fixable by someone other than me.