Maven or Ant?
Maven or Ant?
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
Atomist automates your software deliver experience. It's how modern teams deliver modern software.
Maven vs. Ant is one of the semi-religious topics (like IntelliJ vs. Eclipse, SWT vs. Swing or Spring vs. EJB). Depending on your specific needs, both build tools may be interesting. Ant is just a framework, or a build-DSL, which cannot be used out of the box. You have to create your build-script from existing Ant-tasks. The Ant tasks do not presrcibe any conventions or configuration, the definition of project layout is your responsibility. You have full control of whatever you are doing, which can become a problem in bigger projects.
Maven can be understood as "Ant With Convention Over Configuration". In fact, if you rely on conventions like the "Standard Directory Layout", you can start without any friction or configuration with Maven. You will only need a good Internet connection for the first build. :-).
As with every Convention Over Configuration framework, you will have to understand the conventions to be able to work efficiently. In case the conventions do not work in your case, you will have to overwrite them and the complexity of this task is really hard to estimate.
The real strength of Maven is its dependency management. You only have to declare the dependencies and Maven will download them, setup the classpath for you, and even deploy the dependencies with your application, if required. Maven manages not only the direct dependencies for you, but even the dependencies of the dependecies (transitive dependencies). This is the real strength of Maven. Ant doesn't have such capabilities out-of-the-box (except via Ivy) and it will take a considerable amount of work to emulate Maven's dependency management with Ant.
I use Maven and Ant in my projects, the choice is dependent on the specific needs. Maven is great if:
- You are working with many "creative" developers. It will be hard to establish a defined project structure etc. without tool support.
- The developers are religious about their IDE and are using IntelliJ, NetBeans and Eclipse at the same time.
- You are building a product-like application. You will have to manage different versions and branches with their dependencies.
- You project consists of several teams which work on dependent modules. These modules have to be composed to the application regularly.
- You plan to use checkstyle, pmd, generate a project website etc. It's easy with Maven.
On the other hand, I would choose Ant for:
- "Situational Software" which has to be developed quickly (in a few weeks / months).
- Projects with external dependencies which are working with "cutting edge" libraries. There is no need for finer grained dependency management.
- NetBeans projects :-). They come with predefined Ant scripts which even work perfectly with Hudson. Just check everything into svn and let hudson check it out...
- Legacy projects which do not fit the Maven conventions very well. Violating Maven conventions may become a hassle.
- Projects without explicit requirements for modularization. The deployable output will consist of only a few archives.
In my case, in the last few years the ratio between Maven and Ant was about 50-50. In all indeterminate cases, I would tend to use Ant because of performance and predictability. Such cases, however, are very rare.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.