Over a million developers have joined DZone.
{{announcement.body}}
{{announcement.title}}

DZone's Guide to

# Measuring Time Series Characteristics

· Big Data Zone ·
Free Resource

Comment (0)

Save
{{ articles[0].views | formatCount}} Views

Hortonworks Sandbox for HDP and HDF is your chance to get started on learning, developing, testing and trying out new features. Each download comes preconfigured with interactive tutorials, sample data and developments from the Apache community.

A few years ago, I was work­ing on a project where we mea­sured var­i­ous char­ac­ter­is­tics of a time series and used the infor­ma­tion to deter­mine what fore­cast­ing method to apply or how to clus­ter the time series into mean­ing­ful groups. The two main papers to come out of that project were:

I’ve since had a lot of requests for the code which one of my coau­thors has been help­fully email­ing to any­one who asked. But to make it eas­ier, we thought it might be help­ful if I post some updated code here. This is not the same as the R code we used in the paper, as I’ve improved it in sev­eral ways (so it will give dif­fer­ent results). If you just want the code, skip to the bot­tom of the post.

## Find­ing the period of the data

Usu­ally in time series work, we know the period of the data (if the obser­va­tions are monthly, the period is 12, for exam­ple). But in this project, some of our data was of unknown period and we wanted a method to auto­mat­i­cally deter­mine the appro­pri­ate period. The method we used was based on local peaks and troughs in the ACF. But I’ve since devised a bet­ter approach (prompted on cross​val​i​dated​.com) using an esti­mate of the spec­tral density:

```find.freq <- function(x)
{
n <- length(x)
spec <- spec.ar(c(na.contiguous(x)),plot=FALSE)
if(max(spec\$spec)>10) # Arbitrary threshold chosen by trial and error.
{
period <- round(1/spec\$freq[which.max(spec\$spec)])
if(period==Inf) # Find next local maximum
{
j <- which(diff(spec\$spec)>0)
if(length(j)>0)
{
nextmax <- j[1] + which.max(spec\$spec[j[1]:500])
if(nextmax <= length(spec\$freq))
period <- round(1/spec\$freq[nextmax])
else
period <- 1
}
else
period <- 1
}
}
else
period <- 1

return(period)
}```

The func­tion is called find.freq because time series peo­ple often call the period of sea­son­al­ity the “fre­quency” (which is of course highly confusing).

## Decom­pos­ing the data into trend and sea­sonal components

We needed a mea­sure of the strength of trend and the strength of sea­son­al­ity, and to do this we decom­posed the data into trend, sea­sonal and error terms.

Because not all data could be decom­posed addi­tively, we first needed to apply an auto­mated Box-​​Cox trans­for­ma­tion. We tried a range of Box-​​Cox para­me­ters on a grid, and selected the one which gave the most nor­mal errors. That worked ok, but I’ve since found some papers that pro­vide quite good auto­mated Box-​​Cox algo­rithms that I’ve imple­mented in the fore­cast pack­age. So this code uses Guerrero’s (1993) method instead.

For sea­sonal time series, we decom­posed the trans­formed data using an stl decom­po­si­tion with peri­odic seasonality.

For non-​​seasonal time series, we esti­mated the trend of the trans­formed data using penal­ized regres­sion splines via the mgcv pack­age.

```decomp <- function(x,transform=TRUE)
{
require(forecast)
# Transform series
if(transform & min(x,na.rm=TRUE) >= 0)
{
lambda <- BoxCox.lambda(na.contiguous(x))
x <- BoxCox(x,lambda)
}
else
{
lambda <- NULL
transform <- FALSE
}
# Seasonal data
if(frequency(x)>1)
{
x.stl <- stl(x,s.window="periodic",na.action=na.contiguous)
trend <- x.stl\$time.series[,2]
season <- x.stl\$time.series[,1]
remainder <- x - trend - season
}
else #Nonseasonal data
{
require(mgcv)
tt <- 1:length(x)
trend <- rep(NA,length(x))
trend[!is.na(x)] <- fitted(gam(x ~ s(tt)))
season <- NULL
remainder <- x - trend
}
return(list(x=x,trend=trend,season=season,remainder=remainder,
transform=transform,lambda=lambda))
}```

## Putting every­thing on a [0,1] scale

We wanted to mea­sure a range of char­ac­ter­is­tics such as strength of sea­son­al­ity, strength of trend, level of non­lin­ear­ity, skew­ness, kur­to­sis, ser­ial cor­re­lat­ed­ness, self-​​similarity, level of chaotic­ity (is that a word?) and the peri­od­ic­ity of the data. But we wanted all these on the same scale which meant map­ping the nat­ural range of each mea­sure onto [0,1]. The fol­low­ing two func­tions were used to do this.

```# f1 maps [0,infinity) to [0,1]
f1 <- function(x,a,b)
{
eax <- exp(a*x)
if (eax == Inf)
f1eax <- 1
else
f1eax <- (eax-1)/(eax+b)
return(f1eax)
}

# f2 maps [0,1] onto [0,1]
f2 <- function(x,a,b)
{
eax <- exp(a*x)
ea <- exp(a)
return((eax-1)/(eax+b)*(ea+b)/(ea-1))
}```

The val­ues of and in each func­tion were cho­sen so the mea­sure had a 90th per­centile of 0.10 when the data were iid stan­dard nor­mal, and a value of 0.9 using a well-​​known bench­mark time series.

## Cal­cu­lat­ing the measures

Now we are ready to cal­cu­late the mea­sures on the orig­i­nal data, as well as on the adjusted data (after remov­ing trend and seasonality).

```measures <- function(x)
{
require(forecast)

N <- length(x)
freq <- find.freq(x)
fx <- c(frequency=(exp((freq-1)/50)-1)/(1+exp((freq-1)/50)))
x <- ts(x,f=freq)

# Decomposition
decomp.x <- decomp(x)

# Adjust data
if(freq > 1)
fits <- decomp.x\$trend + decomp.x\$season
else # Nonseasonal data
fits <- decomp.x\$trend
adj.x <- decomp.x\$x - fits + mean(decomp.x\$trend, na.rm=TRUE)

# Backtransformation of adjusted data
if(decomp.x\$transform)
tadj.x <- InvBoxCox(adj.x,decomp.x\$lambda)
else
tadj.x <- adj.x

# Trend and seasonal measures
v.adj <- var(adj.x, na.rm=TRUE)
if(freq > 1)
{
detrend <- decomp.x\$x - decomp.x\$trend
deseason <- decomp.x\$x - decomp.x\$season
trend <- ifelse(var(deseason,na.rm=TRUE) < 1e-10, 0,
max(0,min(1,1-v.adj/var(deseason,na.rm=TRUE))))
season <- ifelse(var(detrend,na.rm=TRUE) < 1e-10, 0,
max(0,min(1,1-v.adj/var(detrend,na.rm=TRUE))))
}
else #Nonseasonal data
{
trend <- ifelse(var(decomp.x\$x,na.rm=TRUE) < 1e-10, 0,
max(0,min(1,1-v.adj/var(decomp.x\$x,na.rm=TRUE))))
season <- 0
}

m <- c(fx,trend,season)

# Measures on original data
xbar <- mean(x,na.rm=TRUE)
s <- sd(x,na.rm=TRUE)

# Serial correlation
Q <- Box.test(x,lag=10)\$statistic/(N*10)
fQ <- f2(Q,7.53,0.103)

# Nonlinearity
p <- terasvirta.test(na.contiguous(x))\$statistic
fp <- f1(p,0.069,2.304)

# Skewness
sk <- abs(mean((x-xbar)^3,na.rm=TRUE)/s^3)
fs <- f1(sk,1.510,5.993)

# Kurtosis
k <- mean((x-xbar)^4,na.rm=TRUE)/s^4
fk <- f1(k,2.273,11567)

# Hurst=d+0.5 where d is fractional difference.
H <- fracdiff(na.contiguous(x),0,0)\$d + 0.5

# Lyapunov Exponent
if(freq > N-10)
stop("Insufficient data")
Ly <- numeric(N-freq)
for(i in 1:(N-freq))
{
idx <- order(abs(x[i] - x))
idx <- idx[idx < (N-freq)]
j <- idx[2]
Ly[i] <- log(abs((x[i+freq] - x[j+freq])/(x[i]-x[j])))/freq
if(is.na(Ly[i]) | Ly[i]==Inf | Ly[i]==-Inf)
Ly[i] <- NA
}
Lyap <- mean(Ly,na.rm=TRUE)
fLyap <- exp(Lyap)/(1+exp(Lyap))

m <- c(m,fQ,fp,fs,fk,H,fLyap)

# Measures on adjusted data
xbar <- mean(tadj.x, na.rm=TRUE)
s <- sd(tadj.x, na.rm=TRUE)

# Serial
Q <- Box.test(adj.x,lag=10)\$statistic/(N*10)
fQ <- f2(Q,7.53,0.103)

# Nonlinearity
p <- terasvirta.test(na.contiguous(adj.x))\$statistic
fp <- f1(p,0.069,2.304)

# Skewness
sk <- abs(mean((tadj.x-xbar)^3,na.rm=TRUE)/s^3)
fs <- f1(sk,1.510,5.993)

# Kurtosis
k <- mean((tadj.x-xbar)^4,na.rm=TRUE)/s^4
fk <- f1(k,2.273,11567)

m <- c(m,fQ,fp,fs,fk)
names(m) <- c("frequency", "trend","seasonal",
"autocorrelation","non-linear","skewness","kurtosis",
"Hurst","Lyapunov",
"dc autocorrelation","dc non-linear","dc skewness","dc kurtosis")

return(m)
}```

Here is a quick exam­ple applied to Aus­tralian monthly gas production:

```library(forecast)
measures(gas)
frequency              trend           seasonal    autocorrelation
0.1096             0.9989             0.9337             0.9985
non-linear           skewness           kurtosis              Hurst
0.4947             0.1282             0.0055             0.9996
Lyapunov dc autocorrelation      dc non-linear        dc skewness
0.5662             0.1140             0.0538             0.1743
dc kurtosis
0.9992```

The func­tion is far from per­fect, and it is not hard to find exam­ples where it fails. For exam­ple, it doesn’t work with mul­ti­ple sea­son­al­ity — try measure(taylor) and check the sea­son­al­ity. Also, I’m not con­vinced the kur­to­sis pro­vides any­thing use­ful here, or that the skew­ness mea­sure is done in the best way pos­si­ble. But it was really a proof of con­cept, so we will leave it to oth­ers to revise and improve the code.

In our papers, we took the mea­sures obtained using R, and pro­duced self-​​organizing maps using Vis­cov­ery. There is now a som pack­age in R for that, so it might be pos­si­ble to inte­grate that step into R as well. The den­do­gram was gen­er­ated in mat­lab, although that could now also be done in R using the ggden­dro pack­age for example.

Hortonworks Community Connection (HCC) is an online collaboration destination for developers, DevOps, customers and partners to get answers to questions, collaborate on technical articles and share code examples from GitHub.  Join the discussion.

Topics:

Comment (0)

Save
{{ articles[0].views | formatCount}} Views

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

# {{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}

### {{ parent.tldr }}

{{ parent.urlSource.name }}