In-Memory Computing: In Plain English
In-Memory Computing: In Plain English
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
Sensu is an open source monitoring event pipeline. Try it today.
After five days (and eleven meetings) with new customers in Europe, Russia, and the Middle East, I think time is right for another refinement of in-memory computing’s definition. To me, it is clear that our industry is lagging when it comes to explaining in-memory computing to potential customers and defining what in-memory computing is really about. We struggle to come up with a simple, understandable definition of what in-memory computing is all about, what problems it solves, and what uses are a good fit for the technology.
In-Memory Computing: What Is It?
In-memory computing means using a type of middleware software that allows one to store data in RAM, across a cluster of computers, and process it in parallel. Consider operational datasets typically stored in a centralized database which you can now store in “connected” RAM across multiple computers. RAM, roughly, is 5,000 times faster than traditional spinning disk. Add to the mix native support for parallel processing, and things get very fast. Really, really, fast.
RAM storage and parallel distributed processing are two fundamental pillars of in-memory computing.
RAM storage and parallel distributed processing are two fundamental pillars of in-memory computing. While in-memory data storage is expected of in-memory technology, the parallelization and distribution of data processing, which is an integral part of in-memory computing, calls for an explanation.
Parallel distributed processing capabilities of in-memory computing are… a technical necessity. Consider this: a single modern computer can hardly have enough RAM to hold a significant dataset. In fact, a typical x86 server today (mid-2014) would have somewhere between 32GB to 256GB of RAM. Although this could be a significant amount of memory for a single computer, that’s not enough to store many of today’s operational datasets that easily measure in terabytes.
To overcome this problem in-memory computing software is designed from the ground up to store data in a distributed fashion, where the entire dataset is divided into individual computers’ memory, each storing only a portion of the overall dataset. Once data is partitioned – parallel distributed processing becomes a technical necessity simply because data is stored this way.
And while it makes the development of in-memory computing software challenging (literally fewer than 10 companies in the world have mastered this type of software development) — end users of in-memory computing seeking dramatic performance and scalability increas benefit greatly from this technology.
In-Memory Computing: What Is It Good For?
Let’s get this out of the way first: if one wants a 2-3x performance or scalability improvements – flash storage (SSD, Flash on PCI-E, Memory Channel Storage, etc.) can do the job. It is relatively cheap and can provide that kind of modest performance boost.
To see, however, what a difference in-memory computing can make, consider this real-live example…
Last year GridGain won an open tender for one of the largest banks in the world. The tender was for a risk analytics system to provide real-time analysis of risk for the bank’s trading desk (common use case for in-memory computing in the financial industry). In this tender GridGain software demonstrated one billion (!) business transactions per second on 10 commodity servers with the total of 1TB of RAM. The total cost of these 10 commodity servers? Less than $25K.
Now, read the previous paragraph again: one billion financial transactions per second on $25K worth of hardware. That is the in-memory computing difference — not just 2-3x times faster; more than 100x faster than theoretically possible even with the most expensive flash-based storage available on today’s market (forget about spinning disks). And 1TB of flash-based storage alone would cost 10x of entire hardware setup mentioned.
Importantly, that performance translates directly into the clear business value:
- you can use less hardware to support the required performance and throughput SLAs, get better data center consolidation, and significantly reduce capital costs, as well as operational and infrastructure overhead, and
- you can also significantly extend the lifetime of your existing hardware and software by getting increased performance and improve its ROI by using what you already have longer and making it go faster.
And that’s what makes in-memory computing such a hot topic these days: the demand to process ever growing datasets in real-time can now be fulfilled with the extraordinary performance and scale of in-memory computing, with economics so compelling that the business case becomes clear and obvious.
In-Memory Computing: What Are The Best Use Cases?
I can only speak for GridGain here but our user base is big enough to be statistically significant. GridGain has production customers in a wide variety of industries:
- Investment banking
- Insurance claim processing & modeling
- Real-time ad platforms
- Real-time sentiment analysis
- Merchant platform for online games
- Hyper-local advertising
- Geospatial/GIS processing
- Medical imaging processing
- Natural language processing & cognitive computing
- Real-time machine learning
- Complex event processing of streaming sensor data
And we’re also seeing our solutions deployed for more mundane use cases, like speeding the response time of a student registration system from 45 seconds to under a half-second.
By looking at this list it becomes pretty obvious that the best use cases are defined not by specific industry but by the underlying technical need, i.e. the need to get the ultimate best and uncompromised performance and scalability for a given task.
In many of these real-life deployments in-memory computing was an enabling technology, the technology that made these particular systems possible to consider and ultimately possible to implement.
The bottom line is that in-memory computing is beginning to unleash a wave of innovation that’s not built on Big Data per se, but on Big Ideas, ideas that are suddenly attainable. It’s blowing up the costly economics of traditional computing that frankly can’t keep up with either the growth of information or the scale of demand.
As the Internet expands from connecting people to connecting things, devices like refrigerators, thermostats, light bulbs, jet engines and even heart rate monitors are producing streams of information that will not just inform us, but also protect us, make us healthier and help us live richer lives. We’ll begin to enjoy conveniences and experiences that only existed in science fiction novels. The technology to support this transformation exists today – and it’s called in-memory computing.
Published at DZone with permission of Nikita Ivanov , DZone MVB. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.