Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
Tests are a must
Compilers are great at telling you that you have miss-typed something or that you assumptions about classes are wrong, but so is executing the code. So if all of my code is already exercised by the tests, than why do I need to have additional check of the compiler. Compile does not make the need for tests to go away, but the tests do make the need for compiler to go away. So if you have close to 100% coverage than you don’t need compiler to tell you that you mistyped something.
I can see how a dynamic language can be a nightmare if you don’t have tests.
Tests are easier to write
Since there are is no compiler to harrass you about types, it is very easy to fake out dependencies. Are you expecting a complicated class, but you know that in your test you are only exercising one method which should return a constant? Piece of cake! Create a nameless object with a single property which has the method and you are done.
Typing is a lot of typing
Typing as the name implies, is just that a lot of typing.
List<Book> books = new ArrayList<Book>();
var books = ;
Functions as first class citizens & Classes with single methods are functions
Having functions as first class citizens which can be passed around is awesome! See Execution in the Kingdom of Nouns! Functions are verbs, and you need both, verbs and nouns to make a sentence.
Recently I got an email from someone pointing out that doing proper Single Responsibility Principle, often resulted in classes which had exactly one method. Odd? Well, actually, it is a function in disguise.
Function closure == Constructor injection
If Class with one method is a function, than dependency injection for that class is the functions closure. Where the function is created specifies what are its dependencies and its visibility, nicely solving the dependency injection problem for functions.
Everything is still true
Where did the inheritance go?
Scaling the Team
I have heard this many times before: I like (insert your dynamic language here) for the first 1000 lines than I miss my types. Well, I have written 10,000’s of lines and I don’t miss the compiler one bit, quite the opposite I have learned to loath when I am back in Java and the compiler gets in the way. So why is my experience different? One word: Tests! I am very serious about testing, and so are my team mates! As long as you have tests, lack of compiler is not a problem and the code scales just fine across more team members. But argument can be made that it scales better:
- Less code to maintain, write and understand
- If you can’t understand it, just rewrite it, after all its just couple of hundred lines, how long can it take you?
Non-blocking API are a stroke of Genius! In short it makes it impossible to write slow tests. After all how can you make the tests slow if all method calls return immediately? That is the reason why I can execute 400 test in under 500ms an every save.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.