My Favorite Coding Interview Question
My Favorite Coding Interview Question
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
The Agile Zone is brought to you in partnership with Techtown Training. Learn how DevOps and SAFe® can be used either separately or in unison as a way to make your organization more efficient, more effective, and more successful in our SAFe® vs DevOps eBook.
Every software engineering interview I have ever participated in has involved a coding exercise. For one position, I would expect three two five separate coding tests. I've written previously about why every company asks these questions, and the best way to handle these as a candidate. But what makes a good coding question?
There is very little data out there about effective interviewing. What data does exists seems to suggest interviews are only good for filtering out candidates that do not meet the minimum bar. According to one popular Google internal study, there is no correlation between interview results and on the job performance.
With this in mind, the coding question I ask is simple. I have found that you can hardly ask a question that's too simple; a substantial number of candidates will have no problem hanging themselves with the smallest amount of rope that you can give them.
Write a function that takes two parameters, a string and an integer. The function will return another string that is similar to the input string, but with certain characters removed. It's going to remove characters from consecutive runs of the same character, where the length of the run is greater than the input parameter.
Ex: "aaab", 2 => "aab" Ex: "aabb", 1 => "ab" Ex: "aabbaa", 1 => "aba"
Note: I'm evaluating your answer on the simplicity of your code. The goal is for it to be readable; someone new should be able to walk into this room afterwards and instantly understand what your function is doing.
I explicitly state the part about what I'm looking for with the candidate. I tell them to use the language they are most comfortable with. Here is what I consider an ideal solution, in Python:
def remove_extra_consecutive(input_str, max_consecutive_chars): output, prev_char, current_char_seen = '', None, 0 for current_char in input_str: if current_char == prev_char: current_char_seen += 1 else: current_char_seen = 0 prev_char = current_char if current_char_seen < max_consecutive_chars: output += current_char return output
While the candidate is writing code, I focus on the following.
- Thought process. How do they get to a solution? Did they talk about their strategy?
- It needs to work. If it doesn't, I will keep pushing them until it does.
- Are the function and the variables well named?
- Is the code as simple as possible, but not more simple?
- Is the candidate struggling to remember standard library functions? Help them out.
The most common variant answer I see is conflating the clauses that count the character and append to the output. Typically this results in a bug where the last character in a run is omitted.
def remove_extra_consecutive(input_str, max_consecutive_chars): output, prev_char, current_char_seen = '', None, 1 for current_char in input_str: if current_char == prev_char and current_char_seen < max_consecutive_chars: current_char_seen += 1 output += current_char else: if current_char != prev_char: current_char_seen = 1 output += current_char prev_char = current_char return output
Another variant is using indexes instead of a named variable for the previous character. This can often lead to an index out of bounds bug. It's also common to forget to add the last character.
def remove_extra_consecutive(input_str, max_consecutive_chars): output, current_char_seen = '', 0 for i in range(len(input_str) - 1): if input_str[i] == input_str[i+1]: current_char_seen += 1 else: current_char_seen = 0 if current_char_seen < max_consecutive_chars: output += input_str[i] if current_char_seen <= max_consecutive_chars: output += input_str[i+1] return output
Finally some candidates try to alter the input string itself, or sometimes loop indexes, which can lead of off by one errors.
def remove_extra_consecutive(str, max_consecutive_chars): for i in range(len(str)): j = i + 1 while j < len(str): if str[i] != str[j]: break if j - i >= max_consecutive_chars: str = str[0:j] + str[j+1:] j += 1 return str
I like this problem because it has one simple and robust solution, and a number of more complicated and brittle solutions. If a candidate gets through it quickly and correctly, I follow up by asking them about which edge cases they would want to create unit tests for. If it's in a dynamic language, I ask about how to make the function operate on any iterable.
Follow @chase_seibert on Twitter
Published at DZone with permission of Chase Seibert , DZone MVB. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.