Over a million developers have joined DZone.

Object Clone Performance: Preliminary Results

This article takes a look at comparing the fastest ways to clone object in JavaScript. Read on for the results, and feel free to suggest other methods.

· Performance Zone

Discover 50 of the latest mobile performance statistics with the Ultimate Guide to Digital Experience Monitoring, brought to you in partnership with Catchpoint.

Spurred by debate on A Puzzle in JavaScript objects, I wanted to find the best way to clone objects in JavaScript. In this scenario, “best” means “fastest on average”.

I’m using the dataset from this visualization on H1B salaries as a quick way to build many objects. The dataset contains 81,123 objects with 9 keys each.

The experiment is set up like this:

  • load and parse data
  • run clone experiments in series
  • each experiment makes 10 deep copies of the dataset
  • “deep” is allowed to mean just the 2 levels required (objects in array don’t contain more objects)
  • present average runtime of each clone

Each individual experiment uses this runner:

runner(name, method) {
        const times = d3.range(0, this.N).map(() => {
            const t1 = new Date();

            let copy = method(this.state.data);

            const t2 = new Date();
            return t2 - t1;
        });

        let results = this.state.results;
        results.push({name: name,
                      avg: d3.mean(times)});

        this.setState({results: results});
    }

If you spot a problem with that setup, tell me.

Preliminary results, running on my laptop in Chrome 53, are a bit strange. Iterating through the array and doing Object.assign is fastest, and _.cloneDeep is slowest.

I want to add a more context-aware Lodash approach, Immutable.js, and a few different browsers. Then make some graphs

What’s your favorite way to clone objects in JavaScript? I’ll add it to the test.

Is your APM strategy broken? This ebook explores the latest in Gartner research to help you learn how to close the end-user experience gap in APM, brought to you in partnership with Catchpoint.

Topics:
experiment ,web ,objects ,javascript ,browsers ,lodash ,comparison ,performance

Published at DZone with permission of Swizec Teller, DZone MVB. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

The best of DZone straight to your inbox.

SEE AN EXAMPLE
Please provide a valid email address.

Thanks for subscribing!

Awesome! Check your inbox to verify your email so you can start receiving the latest in tech news and resources.
Subscribe

{{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}

{{ parent.tldr }}

{{ parent.urlSource.name }}