Over a million developers have joined DZone.
{{announcement.body}}
{{announcement.title}}

Optimizations gone wild, O(N!) memory leaks

DZone's Guide to

Optimizations gone wild, O(N!) memory leaks

Free Resource

RavenDB vs MongoDB: Which is Better? This White Paper compares the two leading NoSQL Document Databases on 9 features to find out which is the best solution for your next project.  

So, after doing so much work on the indexing optimization, it turned out that we had a bug. I assume that you remember this optimization, right?

image

In which we were able to pre fetch data from the disk and not have to wait for data at all. This all worked beautifully when running on data sets that included simple indexes. But the moment we had map/reduce indexes, something bad happened. That something bad was that we kept missing the batch that we loaded (this relates to how we load & find the appropriate batches).

We do all the lookups by etag, and map/reduce add gaps in the etags. Which meant that we kept missing the etag, and had to start loading things up again. And because whenever we load something we also start loading the next batch…

Here is what the memory looked like:

image

Yup, for every batch we loaded the next 5 batches, for a total of O(N!) items in memory for everything.

Now, we had some cleanup routines, but we did NOT expect to have that much, so we would recover, eventually, but usually not before we consumed all the memory.

Oops!

Do you pay to use your database? What if your database paid you? Learn more with RavenDB.

Topics:

Published at DZone with permission of

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

{{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}

{{ parent.tldr }}

{{ parent.urlSource.name }}