DZone
Java Zone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
  • Refcardz
  • Trend Reports
  • Webinars
  • Zones
  • |
    • Agile
    • AI
    • Big Data
    • Cloud
    • Database
    • DevOps
    • Integration
    • IoT
    • Java
    • Microservices
    • Open Source
    • Performance
    • Security
    • Web Dev
DZone > Java Zone > Limit Your Points of Failure

Limit Your Points of Failure

James Sugrue user avatar by
James Sugrue
CORE ·
Mar. 16, 12 · Java Zone · Interview
Like (0)
Save
Tweet
4.25K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

When reading an article about Web Operations For Developers, one point in particular resonated with me. It discussed how you need to introduce new infrastructure carefully, and how each new shiny piece you add to your product adds another possible point of failure. I've always enjoyed utilizing new technologies and frameworks, but in the past year, I've started scaling back to basics. Why is that? Well, I'm tired of the problems that these new pieces can cause.

Let me illustrate this first with an example. If you've followed any of my posts, you'll have read my ravings about Titanium, which makes mobile development faster, cross platform and generally easy. This has been a great technology to get me going in my mobile app development adventures, but I'm going to have to call it quits. Why? I'm missing the real control. Sure, I can write a wrapper to provide some API/feature to my higher level framework. But is that overkill? Shouldn't I just use the lower level Objective-C or Java APIs in the first place? There are workarounds for almost everything, but workarounds take time too.

In fact, most of the frameworks that end up getting in your way provide an excellent starting point, and things look really good for a while. You've passed out someone who took a more traditional low level path. But for all that start-up speed, it's the last 20% that's going to slow you down. Who wins out in the end? Usually the guy who went with the more basic approach. Most of the time you'll need to go messing around with the internals anyway, to get things working as you'd like. 

While I'm sure I'm not the only one who has hit this type of problem, there's a lot of good productivity frameworks available - Roo and Play! seem to be popular. But I haven't used these enough myself to see if there are any flaws. 

So, are you someone who's been burnt one too many times by introducing a 'saviour technology' and adding a critical point of failure? What frameworks have you used that promised the world and caused you 12 hour days?

 

mobile app Framework Cross platform Objective C Web operations Workaround Productivity Scaling (geometry)

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Popular on DZone

  • Remote Debugging and Developer Observability
  • On Architects, Architecture, and Failures
  • Anatomy of a Webhook HTTP Request
  • 12 Modern CSS Techniques For Older CSS Problems

Comments

Java Partner Resources

X

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Send feedback
  • Careers
  • Sitemap

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • MVB Program
  • Become a Contributor
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 600 Park Offices Drive
  • Suite 300
  • Durham, NC 27709
  • support@dzone.com
  • +1 (919) 678-0300

Let's be friends:

DZone.com is powered by 

AnswerHub logo