Quarks and Cats – but is this really progress?
Recent events have me asking if we’re really all that better off with both our science and our technology. Before you jump on that statement, read on.
My son. Max who is now 11, is into his science in a big way. Yes – he is a geek and he is proud of it. His knowledge of particle physics is extraordinary and we have been attending some of the evening lectures at both the Royal Institution and Royal Society which are on our doorstep in central London. The birth of modern science happened here and many of the 118 elements in the periodic table were discovered in one or other of these august bodies.
BTW For any visitors to London it is worth popping into the Royal Institution on Albermale Street and Royal Society just off The Mall just to gaze at the incredible architecture that have been lovingly restored to its former glory.
There are the traditional educational lectures and the hugely successful Royal Institution Christmas Lectures for Kids, but we have also discovered a hotbed of science comedy events. Yes, scientists making fun of each other. Some are very organized such as the recent “Big Science / Small Science“ series at the Royal Institution, but there is also the science equivalent of the pub “Open Mic” where anyone can try their hand at science stand-up, one of which is called ScienceShowoff.
Max has become a bit of a celebrity at these events for a couple of reasons. He is only 11, his wikipedic knowledge (the modern day version of encyclopedic knowledge), and he has started a t-shirt company called ElementaryStuff where science jokes or your name are printed using elements from the periodic table.
It gets complicated
To appreciate these events you need to have a basic understanding of particle physics. You need to know your gluon from your charm quark and your neutrino from your electron. And in a recent lecture by John Gibbon based on his book “Computing with Quantum Cats” I have to admit I was a little lost by the end. He talked about the evolution of computing from the Turing Machines of the 1940s through the Quantum Computers that are now commercially available from D-Wave.
The reason that a quantum computer is so powerful is due to a quirk of physics what happens when you get down to subatomic particle level. It is called superposition. What this means is that a physical system—such as an electron – exists partly in all its particular, theoretically possible states at the same time.
Whilst all this computing power is hugely powerful and hugely impressive, I spent time in the lectures asking myself if this is really progress. Clearly it is scientific and computing progress. But is it making the quality of life for the general public any better?
The technology culprit
That question could be asked of all technology with the greatest culprit being the invention of time – or at least the clock. The promise that computers will save us time by removing the drudgery of life has been there ever since I have been alive. I remember when there was a huge concerns that society would not know what to do with all the leisure time we would have. But if I look at my life and my friends and colleagues it seems that the technology we carry around with us has made is even more busy, or time poor. It has blurred the lines between work and non-work so badly that we are all “always-on”. Hell, I am writing this article on a beautiful sunny Saturday morning at my parents house, grabbing some time before we go out.
Now people look at their messages on their phone before they even get out of bed. A recent statistic from the excellent “What the F*CK is Social Media” article by BrandInflitration. is that 1/3 of women aged 18-34 check Facebook when they first wake up—even before going to the bathroom.
A better experience?
Progress is about reducing stress for employees and customers. About delivering better customer experience (CX). About employees enjoying their time at work, not clock watching and doing the minimum possible to get by.
But my observation is virtually every company has not even mastered the basics. I have no shortage of material for my regular column called “Mr Angry rants about CX”. And the problems are could easily fixed with the technology that exists today. In fact many of them could be fixed with the technology available in the 1700’s — pen and paper combined with the human brain AND ENOUGH TIME to do the job properly. We claim that that multi-tasking is clever. But there’s nothing cool about doing two things wrong at once.
Before we get too excited
So before we get too excited about the potential of Gartner’s Nexus of Forces, Big Data, event enabled enterprises, quantum computers, wearable applications and the rest we should take a hard look at what CX means for our customers and how we deliver that with the least amount of effort and stress for our employees. Do that and you have guaranteed competitive advantage. Why? Because every other one of your competitors is still “banging the rocks together”.
Whilst I am starting to get my head around quantum mechanics and the potential of superposition and the lure of something being in two places at the same time, what I really want is the Sky engineer to be in in just ONE place. The place he told me he would be; my house on Thursday. Which why I stayed in all day waiting for him. But he didn’t appear and didn’t call. Which is not what I call progress.