Raven Storage: Early Performance Numbers
Raven Storage: Early Performance Numbers
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.
Join For FreeRavenDB vs MongoDB: Which is Better? This White Paper compares the two leading NoSQL Document Databases on 9 features to find out which is the best solution for your next project.
So, our managed implementation of LevelDB is just about ready to go out and socialize. Note that these are just for a relatively short duration, but they give us a good indicator of where we are. We are still running longer term performance tests now. Also note that they are early numbers. We did performance work, but it is still not done.
The following tests were done on an HDD, and all include writing a million records (16 bytes key, 100 bytes values) to storage.
- Writing 1 million sequential keys - 52,152 op/s
- Writing 1 million random keys - 11,986 op/s
- Writing 1 million sequential keys with fsync - 17,225 op/s
And now for the reads portion:
- Sequential reads - 104,620 op/s
- Reverse sequential reads - 57,932 op/s
- Random reads - 3,191 op/s
Note that I am pretty sure that the reason for the latter performance is that it is using an HDD, instead of an SSD.
Do you pay to use your database? What if your database paid you? Learn more with RavenDB.
Like This Article? Read More From DZone
Published at DZone with permission of Oren Eini, CEO RavenDB , DZone MVB. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.
{{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}
{{ parent.tldr }}
{{ parent.linkDescription }}
{{ parent.urlSource.name }}