DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports Events Over 2 million developers have joined DZone. Join Today! Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile Manage Email Subscriptions Moderation Admin Console How to Post to DZone Article Submission Guidelines
View Profile
Sign Out
Refcards
Trend Reports
Events
Zones
Culture and Methodologies Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks
Culture and Methodologies
Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering
AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture
Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding
Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance
Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks

Reading Code: Assume it doesn’t work

Mark Needham user avatar by
Mark Needham
·
Mar. 01, 13 · Interview
Like (0)
Save
Tweet
Share
1.79K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

Jae and I have spent a reasonable chunk of the past few weeks pairing on code that neither of us are familiar with and at times we’ve found it quite difficult to work out exactly what it’s supposed to be doing.

My default stance in this situation is to assume that the code is probably correct and then try and work out how that’s the case.

After I’d vocalised this a few times, Jae pointed out that we couldn’t be sure that the code worked and it didn’t make sense to start with that as an assumption.

He pointed out that we were often going down paths of the code that were executed infrequently and since there were no tests around the code we couldn’t be sure what it did.

A more useful approach was to assume that it doesn’t work and then reason about it from scratch to determine whether or not that assumption is correct.

I quite like making this assumption because it makes you concentrate much more closely when you’re reading the code rather than skimming over it and assuming that it does what it’s supposed to do.

Reading the code has become a mini debugging session where we try to discover how some unfamiliar code actually works.

We’ve found a couple of bits of code that weren’t actually working by following this mindset but it is mentally quite tiring and obviously slower than other styles of reading code!



IT

Published at DZone with permission of Mark Needham, DZone MVB. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Popular on DZone

  • Top 5 Java REST API Frameworks
  • Fraud Detection With Apache Kafka, KSQL, and Apache Flink
  • ChatGPT: The Unexpected API Test Automation Help
  • Express Hibernate Queries as Type-Safe Java Streams

Comments

Partner Resources

X

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Send feedback
  • Careers
  • Sitemap

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 600 Park Offices Drive
  • Suite 300
  • Durham, NC 27709
  • support@dzone.com
  • +1 (919) 678-0300

Let's be friends: