# Runge-Kutta Implemented as a Fold in Haskell

# Runge-Kutta Implemented as a Fold in Haskell

### This post shows how the Runge-Kutta method can be written naturally as a fold over the set of points where the solution is needed. These points do not need to be evenly spaced.

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For FreexMatters delivers integration-driven collaboration that relays data between systems, while engaging the right people to proactively resolve issues. Read the Monitoring in a Connected Enterprise whitepaper and learn about 3 tools for resolving incidents quickly.

One of the most widely used numerical algorithms for solving differential equations is the 4th order Runge-Kutta method. This post shows how the Runge-Kutta method can be written naturally as a fold over the set of points where the solution is needed. These points do not need to be evenly spaced.

Given a differential equation of the form

with initial condition *y*(*t*_{0}) = *y*_{0}, the 4th order Runge-Kutta method advances the solution by an amount of time *h* by

where

The Haskell code for implementing the accumulator function for `foldl`

looks very much like the mathematical description above. This is a nice feature of the `where`

syntax.

```
rk (t, y) t' = (t', y + h*(k1 + 2.0*k2 + 2.0*k3 + k4)/6.0)
where
h = t' - t
k1 = f t y
k2 = f (t + 0.5*h) (y + 0.5*h*k1)
k3 = f (t + 0.5*h) (y + 0.5*h*k2)
k4 = f (t + 1.0*h) (y + 1.0*h*k3)
```

Suppose we want to solve the differential equation *y* ‘ = (*t*^{2} – *y*^{2}) sin(*y*) with initial condition *y*(0) = -1, and we want to approximate the solution at [0.01, 0.03, 0.04, 0.06]. We would implement the right side of the equation as

` f t y = (t**2 - y**2)*sin(y)`

and fold the function `rk`

over our time steps with

` foldl rk (0, -1) [0.01, 0.03, 0.04, 0.06]`

This returns (0.06, -0.9527). The first part, 0.06, is no surprise since obviously we asked for the solution up to 0.06. The second part, -0.9527, is the part we’re more interested in.

If you want to see the solution at all the specified points and not just the last one, replace `foldl`

with `scanl`

.

` scanl rk (0, -1) [0.01, 0.03, 0.04, 0.06]`

This returns

` [(0.0, -1.0), (0.01, -0.9917), (0.03, -0.9756), (0.042, -0.9678), (0.06, -0.9527)]`

As pointed out in the previous post, writing algorithms as folds separates the core of the algorithm from data access. This would allow us, for example, to change `rk`

independently, such as using a different order Runge-Kutta method. (Which hardly anyone does. Fourth order is a kind of sweet spot.) Or we could swap out Runge-Kutta for a different ODE solver entirely just by passing a different function into the fold.

Published at DZone with permission of John Cook , DZone MVB. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

## {{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}

## {{ parent.tldr }}

## {{ parent.linkDescription }}

{{ parent.urlSource.name }}