Platinum Partner
java,scala,languages

Scala Tail Recursion Confusion

I was looking at a video of Martin Odersky's keynote during Scala Days 2014 and there was a sample tail recursion code that confused me:

@tailrec
private def sameLength[T, U](xs: List[T], ys: List[U]): Boolean = {
  if (xs.isEmpty) ys.isEmpty
  else ys.nonEmpty && sameLength(xs.tail, ys.tail)
}

On a quick glance, this did not appear to be tail recursive to me, as there is the && operation that needs to be called after the recursive call.

However, thinking a little more about it, && is a short-circuit operator and the recursive operation would get called only if the ys.nonEmpty statement evaluates to true, thus maintaining the definition of a tail recursion.

The decompiled class clarifies this a little more, surprisingly the && operator does not appear anywhere in the decompiled code!:

public <T, U> boolean org$bk$sample$SameLengthTest$$sameLength(List<T> xs, List<U> ys)
{
  for (; ys.nonEmpty(); xs = (List)xs.tail()) ys = (List)ys.tail();
  return 
xs.isEmpty() ? ys.isEmpty() : false;
}
If the operator were changed to something that does not have short-circuit behavior, the method of course will not be a tail-recursion at that point, say a hypothetical method with the XOR operator:
private def notWorking[T, U](xs: List[T], ys: List[U]): Boolean = {
  if (xs.isEmpty) ys.isEmpty
  else ys.nonEmpty ^ notWorking(xs.tail, ys.tail)
 }

Something fairly basic that tripped me up today!

Published at DZone with permission of {{ articles[0].authors[0].realName }}, DZone MVB. (source)

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

{{ tag }}, {{tag}},

{{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}

{{ parent.tldr }}

{{ parent.urlSource.name }}
{{ parent.authors[0].realName || parent.author}}

{{ parent.authors[0].tagline || parent.tagline }}

{{ parent.views }} ViewsClicks
Tweet

{{parent.nComments}}