Over a million developers have joined DZone.
{{announcement.body}}
{{announcement.title}}

Separation of Concerns in Vaadin

DZone's Guide to

Separation of Concerns in Vaadin

· Java Zone
Free Resource

Are you joining the containers revolution? Start leveraging container management using Platform9's ultimate guide to Kubernetes deployment.

Last week, we quickly created a Delete generated column in a table.

Although this is enough to attain our objective, two nested anonymous classes puts a strain on maintenance costs. Moreover, behavior code (the deletion) is interwoven with GUI code (column).

Correcting these mistakes can be achieved through the creation of two top-level classes, one for the deletion behavior, and the other for the column. We have to find a way to pass the data container and the item id to the behavior class: the most obvious way to do so it change the latter's structure to store both like so:

public class DeleteButtonColumnGenerator implements ColumnGenerator {
 
    @Override
    public Object generateCell(Table source, Object itemId, Object columnId) {
 
        Button button = new Button("Delete");
 
        button.addListener(new DeleteClickListener(itemId, source.getContainerDataSource()));
 
        return button;
    }
}

This design is much more decoupled and maintenance friendly than the following, but we can do better. The click listener's structure is at present tightly coupled to the parameters it needs to access. It would be nice to remove this coupling. Fortunately, Vaadin components can store data on their own. Let's rely on this feature to clean our design.

First, create a placeholder for the container and the item id:

public class ContainerItemId {
 
    private final Object itemId;
     
    private final Container container;
 
    public ContainerItemId(Container container, Object itemId) {
     
        this.itemId = itemId;
        this.container = container;
    }
 
    public Object getItemId() {
     
        return itemId;
    }
 
    public Container getContainer() {
     
        return container;
    }
}

Then, we remove all references to both container and item id from the click listener and use the Vaadin way:

public class DeleteClickListener implements ClickListener {
 
    @Override
    public void buttonClick(ClickEvent event) {
 
        Button button = event.getButton();
         
        ContainerItemId cii = (ContainerItemId) button.getData();
         
        if (cii != null) {
             
            cii.getContainer().removeItem(cii.getItemId());
        }
    }
}

Notice how we get the reference to the button in the event, it's enough!

Finally, we have to pass the data to the button in the column generator:

public class DeleteButtonColumnGenerator implements ColumnGenerator {
 
    @Override
    public Object generateCell(Table source, Object itemId, Object columnId) {
 
        Button button = new Button("Delete");
 
        ContainerItemId cii = new ContainerItemId(source.getContainerDataSource(), itemId);
         
        button.setData(cii);
         
        button.addListener(new DeleteClickListener());
 
        return button;
    }
}

This new design is much more modularized: for application that go beyond prototypes, this approach should be favored over the previous one.

From http://morevaadin.com/content/separation-concerns

Moving towards a private or Hybrid cloud infrastructure model? Get started with our OpenStack Deployment Models guide to learn the proper deployment model for your organization.

Topics:

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

THE DZONE NEWSLETTER

Dev Resources & Solutions Straight to Your Inbox

Thanks for subscribing!

Awesome! Check your inbox to verify your email so you can start receiving the latest in tech news and resources.

X

{{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}

{{ parent.tldr }}

{{ parent.urlSource.name }}