Over a million developers have joined DZone.
{{announcement.body}}
{{announcement.title}}

Some Intuition About the Theory of Statistical Learning

DZone's Guide to

Some Intuition About the Theory of Statistical Learning

· Big Data Zone ·
Free Resource

Hortonworks Sandbox for HDP and HDF is your chance to get started on learning, developing, testing and trying out new features. Each download comes preconfigured with interactive tutorials, sample data and developments from the Apache community.

While I was working on the Theory of Statistical Learning, and the concept of consistency, I found the following popular graph (e.g. from  thoses slides, here in French)

The curve below is the error on the training sample, as a function of the size of the training sample. Above, it is the error on a validation sample. Our learning process is consistent if the two converge.

I was wondering if it was possible to generate such a graph, with some data, and some statistical model. And indeed, it is rather simple, and it gives nice intuition about possible interpretations. Consider some (simple) classification problem. Here, we consider a logistic regression. We generate a sample of size , we fit our model, we compute the misclassification rate, then we generate another sample of size , we use our previous model to make some prediction, and we compute the misclassifiation rate. And we play with .

missclassification <- function(n){
  U=data.frame(X1=runif(n),X2=runif(n))
  p=(U[,1]+U[,2])/2
  U$Y=rbinom(n,size=1,prob=p)
  reg=glm(Y~X1+X2,data=U,family=binomial)
  pd=function(x1,x2) predict(reg,newdata=data.frame(X1=x1,X2=x2),type="response")>.5
  x=seq(0,1,length=101)
  z=outer(x,x,pd)
  cl2=c(rgb(1,0,0,.4),rgb(0,0,1,.4))
  cl1=c("red","blue")
  image(x,x,z,col=cl2,xlab="",ylab="",main="Training Sample")
  points(U$X1,U$X2,pch=19,col=cl1[1+U$Y])

  V=data.frame(X1=runif(n),X2=runif(n))
  p=(V[,1]+V[,2])/2
  V$Y=rbinom(n,size=1,prob=p)
  screen(4)
  image(x,x,z,col=cl2,xlab="",ylab="",main="Validation Sample")
  points(V$X1,V$X2,pch=19,col=cl1[1+V$Y])

  MissClassU=mean(abs(pd(U$X1,U$X2)-U$Y))
  MissClassV=mean(abs(pd(V$X1,V$X2)-V$Y))
return(c(MissClassU,MissClassV))
}


If we plot it, we get (in purple, it is the training sample, and in black, the validation sample)

The graph is not exactly the same as above, but it is probably due to the randomness of our samples. If we generate hundreds of samples, it should be just fine.

MCU=rep(NA,500)
MCV=rep(NA,500)
n=250
  for(i in 1:500){
    U=data.frame(X1=runif(n),X2=runif(n))
    p=(U[,1]+U[,2])/2
    U$Y=rbinom(n,size=1,prob=p)
    reg=glm(Y~X1+X2,data=U,family=binomial)
    pd=function(x1,x2) predict(reg,newdata=data.frame(X1=x1,X2=x2),type="response")>.5
    MCU[i]=mean(abs(pd(U$X1,U$X2)-U$Y))

    V=data.frame(X1=runif(n),X2=runif(n))
    p=(V[,1]+V[,2])/2
    V$Y=rbinom(n,size=1,prob=p)
    MCV[i]=mean(abs(pd(V$X1,V$X2)-V$Y))
  }
  MissClassV=mean(MCU)
  MissClassU=mean(MCV)


Hortonworks Community Connection (HCC) is an online collaboration destination for developers, DevOps, customers and partners to get answers to questions, collaborate on technical articles and share code examples from GitHub.  Join the discussion.

Topics:
bigdata ,big data ,statistical learning

Published at DZone with permission of

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

{{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}

{{ parent.tldr }}

{{ parent.urlSource.name }}