Over a million developers have joined DZone.

Spring.NET Superiority Over MS Unity and Ninject

DZone's Guide to

Spring.NET Superiority Over MS Unity and Ninject

· ·
Free Resource
I'm evaluating .NET-related technologies for the purpose of my latest project (desktop application for processing radiological and pathological images). Today I played with MS Unity and Ninject.

I was quite surprised that either MS Unity nor Ninject are unable to handle bi-directional references, like these:
class A
   B B { get; set; }

class B 
   A A { get; set; }
Both MS Unity and Ninject enter infinite loop (create default constructor and set a break point there).

Spring.NET resolves dependencies without any problems. A huge plus for Spring.NET.


In case someone would argue why I use bi-directional references: it's a desktop application where implementing MVC/MVP requires view to have a reference to controller/presenter and controller/presenter to have a reference to view.

I used latest versions of Unity and Ninject available in NuGet.


Published at DZone with permission of

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

{{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}

{{ parent.tldr }}

{{ parent.urlSource.name }}