Over a million developers have joined DZone.

TDD in Mobile Development, Part 2: Portable Tiny Inversion of Control Container

· Java Zone

Discover how AppDynamics steps in to upgrade your performance game and prevent your enterprise from these top 10 Java performance problems, brought to you in partnership with AppDynamics.

This post is the second in a series that talks about TDD in Mobile Development, the links below show the other parts of the series.

TDD in Mobile Development
1. Unit Testing of Platform-Specific Code in Mobile Development
2. Portable IoC (Portable.TinyIoC) for Mobile Development
3. Cross-Platform Unit Testing – in progress.

In a previous post, we looked at writing unit and integration tests for platform-specific code in Android and iOS. Also, I promised to show you in the next post how to write cross platform unit tests that would assert your logic once and for many platforms. However in order to do that, you need to first consider how testable is your code.


In order to write good unit tests and have a good test coverage around your code, you need to first consider Code Testability. There are many books and blogs that talks about Testability, I find these posts good in demoing and communicating the basics of what is needed 1, and 2.

Basically, your classes/libraries need to declare upfront what dependencies they have. It is not acceptable to have classes that just instantiate (using new keyword or otherwise) other classes, or invoke static methods/fields from other entities. You might ask why? and I am glad you asked. That’s because such classes/libs are not testable. You cannot mock/fake/change their internal behaviours. To make things worse, some of these external dependencies or static classes might be platform dependent or might require certain environment context to return certain output, which means such code would be only testable in few small scenario cases. Yet worse, using static methods gives you more head-ache when it comes to thread safety, which is another topic by itself.

Therefore, your code should be clean enough and declare its dependancies upfront, so that we could test it in separation of other dependencies. For that, the concept of Inversion of Control (IoC) was introduced. IoC containers enables developers to register dependencies at the start of the application in a central point to have a better visibility of dependencies and to allow for a better testability.

There are many IoC containers out there, but very few of them are fit for mobile development. Also, many of these containers are more geared towards large projects with lots of features that are not relevant to mobile apps. I found this question and answers on StackOverFlow which talks about the popularity and suitability of the latest IoC containers. In our case, we have been glad using TinyIoC.


TinyIoC is a great light container that allows you to register your entities for the whole app domain. It’s light enough to be included in most small projects, yet feature-rich to offer convenience and flexibility to developers. We have been using it for quite a while now and previously my colleague Mark T. has blogged about it here. TinyIoC comes with mainly two files, the container itself and a small light-weight messengerHub that could be used for communicating messages across different entities/libraries. The bad news for me was that TinyIoC is a platform specific so I had to include a different library in Android and a different one in iOS too. Plus, I could not take that part of my code to my Portable class libraries. So I started thinking about getting this into the next level.

Portable TinyIoC

I forked TinyIoC on github, and simply enough, I got it to compile as a portable library (profile 102) that could be used on the following platforms.

1. Xamarin.Android
2. Xamarin.iOS
3. Windows Phone 8.1+
4. .NET 4.0.3+

All I needed to do was to separate the library into two different parts, a TinyIoC.Core which targets .NET 4.0 (old Reflection API), and a Portable Wrapper that targets Portable profile (102), and now we have a Portable TinyIoC, you can find it on my github account here. I am still working on making it a Nuget Package or submitting a pull request, but so far I have it working in a stable condition and I have all unit tests passing.

Examples of Using TinyIoC on iOS

Like with most IoC containers, you need to register your dependencies (or set auto-discovery to on :) ), so on the start of the app, we register like this:

public static class Bootstrap
    public static void BuckleUp (AppDelegate appDelegate)
            TinyIoCContainer.Current.Register<ITinyMessengerHub, TinyMessengerHub>();
            TinyIoCContainer.Current.Register<AppDelegate> (appDelegate);
            TinyIoCContainer.Current.Register<ILogger> (TinyIoCContainer.Current.Resolve<Logger> ());
            TinyIoCContainer.Current.Register<ICloudMobileDataService> (TinyIoCContainer.Current.Resolve<AzureMobileService> ());
            TinyIoCContainer.Current.Register<IUserRepository> (TinyIoCContainer.Current.Resolve<UserRepository> ());

As you can see, this Bootstrap class gets called from the main AppDelegate, passing it a reference to the app delegate, and it will register all dependencies. Remember that you need to register your dependencies in order, otherwise you might end up with exceptions. The great thing about this is, not only you could mock pretty much everything and test however way you want, but you also do not need to repeat instantiate all dependencies to get a certain entity. As an example, if your viewModel takes 3 parameters in the constructor, all of these are other entities (cloud service, repository, etc), you only need to user container.Resolve() and it will get you your entity with all its dependencies, bingo :)
Also, TinyIoC manages any disposable objects and dispose of them properly.

Examples of Using TinyIoC on Android

On Android, you would not notice much difference, except in the placement of the entry point (BuckleUp()), which in this case gets called from within the MainLauncher activity. Our Android bootstrap would look like this:

public static class Bootstrap
        public async static Task BuckleUp(IActivity activity)
            TinyIoCContainer.Current.Register<ITinyMessengerHub, TinyMessengerHub>();
            // more code is omitted


In Conclusions, I have shown how simple and elegant it is to use an IoC containers. I prefer TinyIoC because it is very light and now we have a portable version of it, so you have no excuse no more. Start looking at integrating TinyIoC.Portable into your next mobile project and I would love to hear your thoughts. In the next post, we will look at Corss-Platform Unit Testing

TDD in Mobile Development
1. Unit Testing of Platform-Specific Code in Mobile Development.
2. Portable IoC (Portable.TinyIoC) for Mobile Development
3. Cross-Platform Unit Testing – in progress.

The Java Zone is brought to you in partnership with AppDynamics. AppDynamics helps you gain the fundamentals behind application performance, and implement best practices so you can proactively analyze and act on performance problems as they arise, and more specifically with your Java applications. Start a Free Trial.


Published at DZone with permission of Has Altaiar, DZone MVB. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

The best of DZone straight to your inbox.

Please provide a valid email address.

Thanks for subscribing!

Awesome! Check your inbox to verify your email so you can start receiving the latest in tech news and resources.

{{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}

{{ parent.tldr }}

{{ parent.urlSource.name }}