Over a million developers have joined DZone.
{{announcement.body}}
{{announcement.title}}

The Criteria to Consider for Choosing JavaScript Testing Frameworks

DZone's Guide to

The Criteria to Consider for Choosing JavaScript Testing Frameworks

With the abundance of test automation frameworks out there for the web, let's break down which are the most helpful for JavaScript testing.

· Web Dev Zone ·
Free Resource

Deploying code to production can be filled with uncertainty. Reduce the risks, and deploy earlier and more often. Download this free guide to learn more. Brought to you in partnership with Rollbar.

Since JavaScript is widely considered the “language of the web”, it comes to no surprise that test automation frameworks for the language are the most plentiful and most popular. However, this can also make it more difficult to choose the right ones for your team.

By considering the attributes of different frameworks, it’ll become more clear as to which one is the right fit for your current workflow. Follow our guide for selecting JavaScript testing frameworks in order to make the right choice that will lead your organization to lasting success.

Criteria for Selection

When choosing JavaScript testing frameworks, there are going to be many options and different factors to consider. The following criteria are going to most influential in your decision:

E2E or Unit – An end-to-end framework is specialized to run through an entire human interaction on a website. A unit testing framework will give you different capabilities since it’s for testing single functions.

Assertions – Every end-to-end testing framework needs an assertion library. Assertions make sure that our tests return expected results. When choosing a framework, you also need to have a reason for choosing which assertion library you’re going to use and why you’re going to use it.

BDD/TDD Friendly – Some frameworks are not as easy to use with a BDD Girken style language as others, and you will want to stay away from those if your organization is following a certain style. Choose BDD or TDD and pick a framework that makes sense for your team and fits your organizational flow.

Asynchronous testing – When testing JavaScript, it’s important to worry about asynchronous testing and promises. Some frameworks will do this better out of the box than others, which will take longer to grab a promise.

Visual Testing – Some frameworks are better suited for visual testing and capturing screenshots than others, and some actually come out of the box with it. This will give you the ability look at visual differences in your regression suite.

CI Integrations – If your team is following Continuous Integration and Delivery practices, it’s no surprise that you’ll also probably want a framework that integrates with Jenkins, Team City, and Bamboo. Most of the CI systems run on a standard runner, so they work hand in hand with many of the larger JavaScript frameworks to make sure that they work together as well as possible, but it’s still something you want to double-check when choosing.

App Language – The app language criteria has risen recently with the dynamic nature of JavaScript. Previously it was fine to have test code and production code not be the same language. Now, with the way app languages are going in frameworks, we want to pick a framework that is best suited for the actual language that our application is written in.

Speciality – You may be searching for a framework with a certain specialty. Is it easy to set up and get running out of the box? Is there a clean and simple syntax? Is it compatible with Angular testing or a Selenium binding? Does it have good customization? Is it flexible, and can it fit into other assertion libraries, code coverage tools, and frameworks? These are all considerations you’ll want to assess with your team.

Cloud Support – Pay attention to which frameworks work with cloud providers because not every framework will out of the box. Running tests in the cloud will allow you to increase test coverage and speed while eliminating hassle, cost, and maintenance, so compatibility should be part of your consideration.

Size of the Community – The size of the community matters because it’s where you look for answers and find tutorials and documentation, but this also depends on personal preference. For example, one framework may be good because it’s newer so more people are talking about it, but some might prefer a more mature framework that already has a good community base and documentation.

Top JavaScript Frameworks

To get a better idea of specific frameworks and how they meet these criteria, we listed some of the top frameworks used by teams that work in JavaScript.

Assertion Libraries

  • Jasmine – Jasmine is a BDD/TDD compatible unit testing framework with an out-of-the-box assertion library, an easy to read syntax, and broad Angular support.
  • Should.js – Should.js has a BDD assertion library and often pairs with Mocha.
  • Assert.js – Assert.js works with Angular and often is used with Chai to provide a more simple set of assertions.

Unit Testing Frameworks

  • Mocha – The self-proclaimed simple, flexible and fun framework is one of the most popular choices. It depends on other frameworks like Chai for assertions, but it is BDD/TDD compatible and includes a runner. Mocha is a very flexible, extendable, and feature-rich configuration that’s also good for asynchronous testing.
  • Chai – Chai often goes hand-in-hand with Mocha as the most popular assertion library used alongside it. It is also BDD/TDD compatible.
  • Tape – Tape is also a newer framework for unit testing that some might uses as an alternative to Mocha. It uses a traditional syntax, making it very simple to use.
  • Jest – Jest is a runner for unit testing that can adapt to any JavaScript library or framework. It comes with its own assertion library and supports BDD. It’s a newer framework, so it’s less widely used than others.

E2E Frameworks

  • Protractor – Protractor has risen in popularity as a good choice for Angular apps because it puts a 10-second wait at the end of each command for a JavaScript single page app. This is an example of something you’d want to consider when thinking about app language. It would also depend on assertion libraries from another framework.
  • PhantomJS– Phantom.js deals with headless browsers but has had a drop-off in popularity since Chrome came out with their own and real browsers have been optimized to be comparably fast to headless ones.
  • Webdriver.io – Webdriver.io includes visual testing with WebDriver CSS. It also specializes in customization and is a flexible framework where you can fit assertion libraries, code coverage tools, and other frameworks.
  • Nightwatch – Nightwatch is an E2E test framework with its own assertion library and runners. It’s an easy, out of the box setup that a simple syntax, which couples together with a configuration file. Nightwatch is also a custom implementation of W3C WebDriver and works with the JSON wire protocol.
  • CapserJS – Casper.js also works for headless browser testing with a runner for Mocha, Jasmine, and Chai for end-to-end testing. It has added capabilities like assertions and testing utilities that PhantomJS lacks.
  • Karma – Karma is a test runner created by the AngularJS team, making it often the preferred test runner for apps written in Angular. It’s frequently used alongside Jasmine and integrates with popular CI servers as well.
  • Cucumber – Cucumber is a popular BDD framework for functional testing using the Gerkin syntax that works with a lot of these tools and runners, like WebDriver.io. It’s being used more and more as more teams use BDD.
  • InternJS – Intern is a fairly new framework that’s BDD/TDD compatible. As a test runner, it also integrates with CI tools like Jenkins and TeamCity as well the cloud. Don’t let the immaturity of this framework fool you, it has comprehensive documentation and a strong community.

This article was first published on the CrossBrowserTesting blog.

Deploying code to production can be filled with uncertainty. Reduce the risks, and deploy earlier and more often. Download this free guide to learn more. Brought to you in partnership with Rollbar.

Topics:
web dev ,test automation ,frameworks ,javascript ,unit testing ,assertion frameworks ,e2e

Published at DZone with permission of

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

{{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}

{{ parent.tldr }}

{{ parent.urlSource.name }}