The Truth About Software Architecture
The process of software design provides a much more in-depth implementation of its system in practice. We briefly discuss levels of architectural patterns.
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
The software architecture system portrays the system's structure and provides a detailed explanation of how it works and behaves. The system can represent the collection of components that are capable of accomplishing a specific function or a set of functions.
In simple terms, it can be stated that the software architecture offers the basic foundation on which the software can be developed. Its overall success, quality, maintainability, and performance depend on the series of architecture decisions and tradeoffs. The system can be at risk if you fail to consider the common problems and long-term issues.
There are many different high-level architecture patterns and principles that are commonly used in modern systems. Generally, these are considered as different architectural styles.
The system's architecture is generally not limited to a single style; instead is mostly a combination of multiple techniques.
Solving Problems With Architecture Analysis
There are mainly two types of software defects that can lead to security problems: bugs at the implementation stage or flaws in the design stage.
The bugs at the time of the implementation stage stand responsible for at least half of the overall security problems. Other remaining issues can be due to flaws at the time of design. The division of both flaws and bugs is around 50/50. Both these issues need to be secured to make sure that the software works well. One can try to add the best code review program using the most potent tools. But it is a bit difficult to be able to find and fix the flaws in this manner.
Software Architecture and Software Design
The software architecture shows the structure of any given system without showing the implementation details and focusing on the elements and components within the system for the interaction. At the same time, the software design provides much more in-depth implementation details of the system. For example, the design includes the details such as a selection of algorithms and structures, implementation of individual components, and much more.
The concerns of design and architecture often overlap. Therefore, it makes sense to generate benefits of using both instead of following the hard and fast rules to distinguish between them. It is seen that some cases have decisions that are more architectural in nature, whereas in others, they focus heavily on design.
An important point to be noted here is that architecture is a design, but not all designs are architecture. Practically, the architect is the one drawing lines between the software architecture and detailed design. We don't have any specific rules or regulations that can fit in all the cases, but definitely, there had been many attempts to formalize the distinction.
The modern trends of architecture assume that designs constantly evolve over time or during the implementation stages of any system and cannot be fully known by any architect. Yet, at the same time, the software architect keeps learning and testing the design against the real-time requirements. This helps to meet the overall requirements.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.