Three Hot Tips for Working With Collections
Three Hot Tips for Working With Collections
PL/SQL comes with three collection-based data types, each having similarities and differences with each other. Look at some tips for getting the most out of each type!
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
Built by the engineers behind Netezza and the technology behind Amazon Redshift, AnzoGraph™ is a native, Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) distributed Graph OLAP (GOLAP) database that executes queries more than 100x faster than other vendors.
Collections in PL/SQL make it easy for you to implement lists, arrays, stacks, queues, etc. They come in three flavors: associative arrays, nested tables, and varrays. The three types of collections share many features and also have their own special characteristics.
Here are some tips for making the most of collections. At the bottom of the post, I offer links to a number of resources for diving in more deeply on collections.
You Can Query From Collections
Collections are, for the most part, variables you will declare and manipulate in PL/SQL. But you can query from them using the TABLE operator (and in 12.2 and higher you even leave off that operator).
Use this feature to:
- Manipulate table data and in-session collection data within a single SELECT.
- Use the set-oriented power of SQL on your in-session data.
- Build table functions (functions that return collections and can be called in the FROM clause of a query.
Here's a simple demonstration:
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE list_of_names_t IS TABLE OF VARCHAR2 (100); / DECLARE happyfamily list_of_names_t := list_of_names_t (); BEGIN happyfamily.EXTEND (7); happyfamily (1) := 'Veva'; happyfamily (2) := 'Chris'; happyfamily (3) := 'Lauren'; happyfamily (4) := 'Loey'; happyfamily (5) := 'Eli'; happyfamily (6) := 'Steven'; happyfamily (7) := 'Juna'; FOR rec IN ( SELECT COLUMN_VALUE the_name FROM TABLE (happyfamily) ORDER BY the_name) LOOP DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (rec.the_name); END LOOP; END; / Chris Eli Juna Lauren Loey Steven Veva
Prior to Oracle Database 12c, you could only use nested tables and varrays with the TABLE operator. But with 12.1 and above, you can also use it with integer-indexed associative arrays.
You can have a lot more than simply constructing a simple select around your collection (or a function that returns the collection). You can join that collection with other collections or other tables. You can perform set-level operations like UNION and MINUS. You can, in short, treat that collection as a read-only set of rows and columns like any other.
LiveSQL offers a number of scripts demonstrating the TABLE operator here.
Collections Consume Session (PGA) Memory
Just like almost every other type of variable (or constant), collections use PGA — process global area — memory rather than SGA — system global area — memory. This means that the memory for collections is consumed per session.
Suppose you have a program that populates a collection with 1000s of elements of data (which could even be records, not simply scalar values). In that case, every session that executes your program will use that same amount of memory. Things could get out of hand quickly.
When writing your program, ask yourself how many sessions might run it simultaneously and if there are ways to manage/limit the amount of memory used to populate the collection.
If, for example, you are using BULK COLLECT to populate a collection from a query, stay away from SELECT-BULK COLLECT-INTO. That approach could cause issues down the line, as the volume of data returned by the query increases. Consider, instead, using an explicit cursor, with a FETCH statement and a LIMIT clause. The program might need to retrieve 1M rows, but you can fetch just 100 or 1000 at a time, and therefore cap the total PGA consumed (and reused).
You'll find lots more information about setting that limit value here.
I offer a package to help you analyze how much PGA memory your session has consumed here.
FOR Loops Don't Work With Sparse Collections
Many of your collections will be dense (all index values between lowest and highest are defined), but in some cases (especially with associative arrays), your collections will be sparse. If you try to use a numeric FOR loop to iterate through the collection's elements, you will hit a NO_DATA_FOUND exception.
Instead, use the navigation methods (FIRST, LAST, NEXT, PRIOR) to move from one defined index value to the next, and "skip over" undefined values.
In the first block below, l_animals.FIRST returns -100, and that name is then printed. But the next integer higher than -100 is -99. That is not a defined index value, so the attempt to read l_animals(-99) causes the PL/SQL runtime engine to raise a NO_DATA_FOUND exception.
In the second block, I again start with the index value returned by a call to the FIRST method. But I then use NEXT to find the next highest defined index value. So it takes me straight to 1000 and I display the name of the species at that location. The subsequent call to NEXT returns NULL and the loop stops.
Note: Lupus is the species name for wolf, and Loxodonta is the species name for African elephants. May they all live long and prosper!
DECLARE TYPE species_t IS TABLE OF VARCHAR2(10) INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER; l_animals species_t; BEGIN l_animals (-100) := 'Lupus'; l_animals (1000) := 'Loxodonta'; FOR indx IN l_animals.FIRST .. l_animals.LAST LOOP DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (l_animals (indx)); END LOOP; END; / Lupus ORA-01403: no data found DECLARE TYPE species_t IS TABLE OF VARCHAR2(10) INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER; l_animals species_t; l_index PLS_INTEGER; BEGIN l_animals (-100) := 'Lupus'; l_animals (1000) := 'Loxodonta'; l_index := l_animals.FIRST; WHILE l_index IS NOT NULL LOOP DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (l_animals (l_index)); l_index := l_animals.NEXT (l_index); END LOOP; END; / Lupus Loxodonta
You might think to yourself: OK, I will never use a FOR loop with collections. I will always use a WHILE loop with FIRST and NEXT (or LAST and PRIOR to go backwards). That way, it'll work whether it is sparse or dense.
That approach probably will not cause any trauma (performance will be fine), but remember that if you do this, you will never notice that a collection that was supposed to be dense actually became sparse due to a problem in your code (or user error :-) )! In other words, you may be taking out "insurance" that covers up a bug!
Published at DZone with permission of Steven Feuerstein , DZone MVB. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.